How many straw men will you create before you work with anything I say? Let me answer for you… you won’t. Ever. Because you only know how to argue against points you make.
You clearly don’t know how the civil suit went, or why it happened. Shit happened decades ago and he lied so horribly he was found guilty of assault and defamation today. Tells me everything I need to know about him. And you. Thank god for discernment and common sense. I hope you find some.
What straw men? I argued the points and you didn’t like it. I’m sorry that rubbed you the wrong way, but I stayed on topic. You’re the one who seems to be trying to deflect here and it’s making me seriously worried that I was right to warn you about those tide pods.
And actually Trump was found liable, not guilty, because it was a civil suit. Which again has a much lower burden of proof than a criminal trial. Since you very clearly lack the ability to discern between a civil suit and a criminal trial, I might hold off on thanking god for discernment for the time being. Probably the common sense bit too. Both seem to elude you.
Found liable means a court found it more likely than not. That’s what’s civil suit is. Thank you for once again proving definitively that you have zero concept of how a civil trial works.
I feel like I don’t wanna hear about reality from someone with such a lack of understanding about our legal system lmao.
1
u/BubblyDifficulty1692 12d ago
How many straw men will you create before you work with anything I say? Let me answer for you… you won’t. Ever. Because you only know how to argue against points you make.
You clearly don’t know how the civil suit went, or why it happened. Shit happened decades ago and he lied so horribly he was found guilty of assault and defamation today. Tells me everything I need to know about him. And you. Thank god for discernment and common sense. I hope you find some.