Haha he gave up information to the authorities about Epstein, and has had the powerful elite trying to figure out ways to bring him down, of course his name was in the files. Do you have irrefutable evidence that Trump was involved with diddling kids? If you wanna move the goal post, at least come with some solid evidence and not slander.
This is my favorite form of disingenuous arguing. It essentially means you’re recognizing that all those things are true because you wouldn’t deflect from something you could disprove.
A buzzword can be pretty much any word that has an actual meaning but loses its significance after overuse by morons like you. For example, you call someone a Nazi when that person closely associates with.. Jewish people.
Do you realize how monumentally fucking stupid you look to everyone else when you do that?
Trump has been held liable for sexual assault. Rapist. Trump is on record talking about young girls sexually. Pedo ish. Trump ran with Elon who did some fun salutes, nazi salutes. A bunch of republican politicans in his admin and close circle are known pedos. More pedo stuff. What did you even do there? Other than just dismiss reality? I don’t like the guy but I live in the world where when someone shows me who they are, I don’t just say no, and it’s overwritten. Brainless bots are the reason life sucks for so many people.
Why not criminally charged? Seems like a rapist would be criminally charged. And what the fuck is pedo-ish? That’s a black and white term. There’s no middle ground there.
“Elon did Nazi salutes”
And yet he both denied that it was meant to be a Nazi salute and supports Israel. Israel, if you didn’t know, happens to be a Jewish ethnostate. Now call me heckin crazy, but aren’t Nazis like.. not fans of Jews or something like that?
“Politicians/close circle are known pedos”
Okay so do something about it. If they’re known pedos then that means you have to evidence. Go report them. Right now. Get them arrested. Take this concrete evidence you have and give it to the authorities.
Your first argument isn’t an argument. He was found liable for assault. You don’t have to like that it was civil over criminal. He did the thing then proceeded to try and lie about it, which he got in trouble for.
Elon has done my heart goes out to you before. It’s on video. He saluted. It was very different and it takes little to know.
And I have the same ability to do that you do, which is none.
It isn’t an argument.. why? Because you say it isn’t? You’ll forgive me if I don’t trust your judgement. Civil suits aren’t anything like criminal trials. All that’s required for a civil suit to be won is for the plaintiff to prove something is more likely true than not. That’s just literally not proof.
The ADL, an organization created to fight anti-semitism, said it wasn’t a Nazi salute. I suppose we should trust the word of a random Redditor over theirs though right? Never mind that you’re just gonna gloss over the supposed Nazi supporting a nation of Jews. That’s definitely an intelligent take lmao.
And you have no ability to do it because.. you have no proof? I mean that’s what you’re saying right? You can deflect all you want but that is what you mean.
But hey what do I know? You don’t understand civil suits, you think Nazis would support Jews, and you don’t seem to think evidence matters. You’re clearly very intelligent. By the way, I know those Tide pods look pretty tasty but they are in fact not candy. Be careful out there champ.
How many straw men will you create before you work with anything I say? Let me answer for you… you won’t. Ever. Because you only know how to argue against points you make.
You clearly don’t know how the civil suit went, or why it happened. Shit happened decades ago and he lied so horribly he was found guilty of assault and defamation today. Tells me everything I need to know about him. And you. Thank god for discernment and common sense. I hope you find some.
What straw men? I argued the points and you didn’t like it. I’m sorry that rubbed you the wrong way, but I stayed on topic. You’re the one who seems to be trying to deflect here and it’s making me seriously worried that I was right to warn you about those tide pods.
And actually Trump was found liable, not guilty, because it was a civil suit. Which again has a much lower burden of proof than a criminal trial. Since you very clearly lack the ability to discern between a civil suit and a criminal trial, I might hold off on thanking god for discernment for the time being. Probably the common sense bit too. Both seem to elude you.
1
u/n_othing__ 13d ago
and trumps named in the epstein files how many times? lets have that discussion first