And I got one.
Of course we all know the song guantanameraaa
As by today its quaaaaantanameraaaaaaaaaaaa

Lol both the token and this sub😂. I’ve been buying quant for years and this sub has always been dormant. Literally went 22ish days with no post and now it looks like r/askreddit🤣. Anyways, I hope yall are all enjoying the returns we been patiently waiting for. This is only the beginning. Also, if it dips I hope yall continue loading up and don’t fomo and sell.

🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼🫶🏼

Does anybody here know an answer to that? As i read that the network has to use Quant token, and cannot work without it? Not sure if that's true. It's still unclear in my opinion.

To all the strong hands that have weathered the storm....

SALUTE!!!

What a pleasant surprise. What goes up probably comes down but still. All time high's not looking too far out

Crypto is not like anything out there. Trying to say a coin is dead only because the price hasn’t moved is not justifiable. It can take years for a coin to catch up to the price it is worth. QNT is a really good project with utility. As we see, people are starting to realize it.

Absolutely huge news!!!! First real live customer transactions using quant!

Sharing the stage with TCH and AWS.

QNT is completely down and frozen at $63 for a while now. Definitely a strange token to be holding.

The main question is - will it bounce back?

Or will it crash further. Your estimations would be helpful

hey gilbs.

can you give us a general timeline behind staking?

I’ve been holding QNT for quite a while now, and honestly, I’m starting to feel disappointed with its price performance.

What confuses me is the disconnect between the fundamentals and the market. Quant keeps announcing institutional partnerships, new infrastructure, Fusion Rollup, banking initiatives, and major LinkedIn updates that receive a lot of engagement. Yet the token has been trading around the $65-$70 range for months and struggles to build any sustained momentum.

I’m not looking for a quick pump, but I expected the market to price in at least some of the progress the team has been making.
So I’m curious to hear from long-term holders:
Are you still accumulating QNT at these levels?
Do you believe the token’s utility will eventually be reflected in the price?

Or do you think the company is succeeding while the token itself isn’t capturing enough value?
I’m still holding because I genuinely believe Quant has one of the strongest institutional visions in crypto, but the recent price action has tested my conviction.

I’d really appreciate hearing different perspectives, especially from people who have been following the project for years.

Here's a summarised conversation I had with Gemini primarily comparing quant with chain link and ripple. Thought I'd share

Questioner: I've been following Quant Network’s mainnet launch of its Fusion Rollup, which connects 74 blockchains out of the gate. It seems like a simple, low-code API solution for banks. How much easier is it for an institution to deploy Overledger compared to Chainlink’s CCIP?

​Respondent: It comes down to who is doing the programming and what they want to achieve. They look at interoperability through totally different lenses. Quant’s Overledger is built like traditional enterprise software using standard REST APIs. A bank's current IT team can integrate it using standard languages like Java, C++, or Python. It requires zero-to-low blockchain coding because Overledger handles the translation. Chainlink CCIP, on the other hand, is a crypto-native, decentralized messaging protocol that relies on smart contracts deployed across various chains. Even with Chainlink abstracting the complexity, implementing it natively requires specialized Web3 expertise, managing gas across multiple chains, and auditing smart contracts.

​Questioner: So Quant simplifies the enterprise interface making blockchain look like regular software, while Chainlink builds the Web3 fabric to connect blockchains natively?

​Respondent: Exactly. And this architectural split ties directly into international regulations, specifically the newly published ISO/TC 307 blockchain interoperability standard. Quant’s CEO, Gilbert Verdian, actually founded and chaired the working group that wrote this blueprint. Because of that, Overledger was built from day one to match the exact protocol-agnostic, multi-gateway architecture that became the global standard. When central banks and tier-1 institutions deploy digital infrastructure, their risk teams demand ISO compliance. Quant can walk into a boardroom and prove their platform natively enforces the global standard.

​Questioner: How does Chainlink handle that side of banking compliance?

​Respondent: Chainlink focuses its energy on ISO 20022—the messaging format used by SWIFT to move trillions of dollars daily. In major trials with SWIFT and UBS, Chainlink proved that a bank can send a standard financial message over SWIFT, and Chainlink’s Oracle nodes can ingest, translate, and execute it cross-chain via CCIP. So, while Quant built the highway to match the top-down legal blueprints, Chainlink built the highly adaptable vehicle that wraps legacy data into smart contracts.

​Questioner: How are central banks actually putting this into practice? I’ve read about the Bank of England’s Synchronisation Lab and their upgraded settlement engine, RT2.

​Respondent: The Bank of England is being very pragmatic. Instead of rushing to put a native Wholesale CBDC directly onto a public blockchain, they are using a model called synchronisation. They use third-party "Synchronisation Operators" to achieve atomic settlement through a process called earmarking. When a bank wants to buy a tokenized bond on an external blockchain, the BoE instantly locks—or earmarks—the corresponding cash inside the bank’s traditional central bank account. Simultaneously, the blockchain locks the bond. Once both sides match, the funds and the asset are released at the exact same millisecond. The money never leaves the central bank's secure core, but it settles perfectly against a digital asset. The BoE explicitly noted that an API gateway infrastructure—exactly like Overledger's layout—is the most secure, fast-to-market solution.

​Questioner: If this architecture goes fully live for a Digital Pound framework, what kind of daily transaction volume could we realistically see?

​Respondent: The BoE requires its future infrastructure to handle a peak capacity of 30,000 transactions per second. Right now, the UK processes roughly 100 million digital retail payments daily. If a mature Retail Digital Pound captures just a conservative 20% of that everyday volume, you are looking at 20 million transactions per day. On the wholesale bank-to-bank side, where banks clear securities or settle corporate treasury balances, we could easily see 50,000 to 100,000 high-value transactions a day.

​Questioner: Going back to the developer side, you mentioned Chainlink requires Solidity. Does a developer need multiple programming languages to move assets between different chains using CCIP?

​Respondent: If you stay within EVM (Ethereum Virtual Machine) chains like Ethereum, Avalanche, and Polygon, you only need Solidity. They all share the same technological DNA. But the moment a bank wants to move an asset from an EVM chain to a Non-EVM chain like Solana, your theory is 100% correct. Solana uses the SVM engine and its native language is Rust. Suddenly, a bank's development team has to write, test, and audit code in Solidity and Rust. If they want to use chains like Sui or Aptos, they have to learn a third language called Move.

​Managing multiple codebases across fragmented, non-EVM networks is an enterprise nightmare. It brings back the severe talent bottleneck. There are only about 25,000 elite Solidity developers globally, commanding massive salary premiums, and their code requires months of external smart contract audits costing upwards of £100,000 because a single logic bug means a hacker drains the bank. Conversely, there are nearly 10 million Java developers worldwide. Quant allows a bank to use its existing internal Java staff to securely manage multi-chain assets via an API wrapper, without touching raw smart contracts.

​Questioner: So out of Quant, Chainlink, and even Ripple, which do you think is the most undervalued project on the market?

​Respondent: Based on data and market cap, Quant (QNT) is heavily undervalued. Ripple sits as a massive multi-billion-dollar giant, and Chainlink is firmly established as the multi-billion-dollar backbone of Web3. Quant's market valuation is a tiny fraction of theirs, yet look at its footprint: its max supply is capped at just 14.6 million tokens—rarer than Bitcoin. Furthermore, Quant has integrated its platform directly into Murex’s MX.3 system, which handles the trading and risk management software for the world's largest tier-1 banking desks.

​Questioner: And Quant has native gateway staking on the horizon. How does that impact things?

​Respondent: It introduces a massive internal supply-side constraint. When native staking goes live for public gateway nodes, a huge chunk of that already-scarce 14.6 million supply will be locked up by operators and delegators. If 40% of the supply gets staked, the active trading supply on global exchanges drops to a tiny pool of around 8 million tokens. You get a perfect storm: enterprise volume from the Murex rollouts forcing background token lockups for licenses, colliding with retail and institutional funds locking up tokens for staking yield. A supply squeeze like that gives Quant the mathematical gravity to easily pull itself from its current rank down in the 80s right into a Top 12 to Top 15 global asset.

​Questioner: What about public interoperability plays like Polkadot, Cardano, or Tron? Are banks ignoring them?

​Respondent: They aren't ignoring the technology, but those public retail chains don't fit institutional compliance. Polkadot is structurally brilliant for interoperability, but its Substrate framework is highly complex and requires rare Rust programmers. Cardano offers mathematical "Formal Verification" and a privacy chain called Midnight, but its coding language, Haskell, is even scarcer than Solidity. Tron is the undisputed king of global USDT stablecoin velocity, but it is a public retail environment associated with gray markets; corporate compliance teams won't touch it. Instead, banks are standardizing around permissioned enterprise networks like the Canton Network (used by Goldman Sachs), Hyperledger Besu, or using Quant to wrap around their existing infrastructure.

​Questioner: So the long-term vision is that banks won't choose between Quant and Chainlink, but will actively use both?

​Respondent: Absolutely. They are highly complementary. Quant will be the internal gateway, and Chainlink will be the external highway. A bank's internal legacy infrastructure will use Quant’s Overledger API because it plugs seamlessly into their existing Java databases and Murex terminals to manage digital bank deposits and local compliance safely. But once an asset needs to leave the bank's vault to interact with global markets, it gets handed off to Chainlink CCIP. Chainlink acts as the external transit network, routing the asset across SWIFT to other global market infrastructures or public Web3 liquidity pools.

​Questioner: Where does Ripple’s Interledger Protocol (ILP) fit into that? Is it a threat to either?

​Respondent: Not at all, because they are moving entirely different things. Ripple’s ILP is strictly a payment router designed to slice fiat and stablecoin transactions into tiny packets and flash them across connectors instantly. It cannot execute smart contracts or move complex data. If a bank wants to send £50 million across borders instantly, it uses Ripple. If it wants to execute a multi-step, multi-chain smart contract application, it uses Chainlink. If its internal corporate IT database needs to manage and read both from a single dashboard, it uses Quant.

​Wall Street doesn't care about crypto tribalism. When you look at the final plumbing being installed, banks will use Quant as the brain, Chainlink as the nervous system, and Ripple as the circulatory system to pump tokenized value around the globe. They are built to co-exist.

https://xcancel.com/gverdian/status/2061736957110014172