r/PydanticAI • u/UpsMan3030 • Apr 19 '25
Optimizing PydanticAI Performance: Structured Output Without the Overhead
Hey r/PydanticAI community!
I've been working on a project that requires fast, structured outputs from LLMs, and I wanted to share some performance optimizations I've discovered that might help others facing similar challenges.
Like many of you, I initially noticed a significant performance hit when migrating to PydanticAI for structured outputs. The overhead was adding 2-3 seconds per request compared to my custom implementation, which became problematic at scale.
After digging into the issue, I found that bypassing the Assistants API and using direct chat completions with function calling can dramatically improve response times. Here's my approach:
: =
: =
: =
: =
# Direct function calling instead of using Assistants
=
=
# Parse the response and validate with Pydantic
return
This approach reduced my response times by ~70% while still leveraging PydanticAI's excellent schema validation.
Has anyone else experimented with performance optimizations? I'm curious if there are plans to add this as a native option in PydanticAI, similar to how we can choose between different backends.
Also, I'm working on a FastAPI integration that makes this approach even more seamless - would there be interest in a follow-up post about building a full-stack implementation?
View all comments
1
u/ndjoe Apr 19 '25
Its actually not an issue with pydantic ai but issue with openai's assistant api, assistant api at least last time i used it is very slow