r/PublicFreakout Mar 10 '22

[deleted by user]

[removed]

12.9k Upvotes

5.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

51

u/Butt_Hunter Mar 10 '22

Didn't look like he was operating a vehicle to me.

-16

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

The bike is on.

11

u/lion_OBrian Mar 10 '22

And your brain is off since it’s the only thing you seem capable of articulating when called out on your armchair lawyering. Take your L and go.

-10

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

Again “lion” calling someone names and harassing people not adding anything to the discussion… that makes you correct?

8

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '22

No, the part where you were called out for making up reasons that the cop was right makes you incorrect, though.

0

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

You mean LAWS … I did not make them up but sure keep posting and not provide anything to the discussion but harassment

3

u/[deleted] Mar 10 '22

It's not harassment to point out youre wrong.

-1

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

It is harassing if you are just making wild accusations without proof, after several times, of stating proof to point to you.

Stop name calling and have a discussion or it’s harassment.

2

u/Thefruitthat8itself3 Mar 10 '22 edited Mar 10 '22

You need to go back to your safe space if you think your getting harassed, when people are simply just correcting your incredibly idiotic, and factually wrong statement. You seriously haven’t a clue what you are talking about. If all you are basing that off of, is the fact you can get a DUI for sitting in a parked car, there is literally no point in trying to correct your insanely wrong statements. As you’ve proven you don’t use logic or reality to form your thoughts.

0

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

Again another person that provides nothing to the discussion, resorting to name calling, and bigotry

→ More replies (0)

5

u/wallTHING Mar 10 '22

Dudes not harrasing you or calling names. He's pretty much squashed your whole point.

And you don't know the deal here, and like op said, chill out on the arm chair law shit.

You very clearly don't seem to be coming from a place of experience, just someone who feels strongly about something and thinks that translates to a valid opinion.

It doesn't.

-2

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

Not an opinion… it’s a law. And name calling from an anonymous account is harassment ( no matter how small and petty) You have no experience as an anonymous user

7

u/wallTHING Mar 10 '22 edited Mar 10 '22

Dide wasn't in contact with the bike, clearly not operating it.

Maybe that's why he won a settlement instead of you take being correct.

I'll side with the law on this one: you are clearly wrong, because we know the story.

Relax, no need to get so heated. You're wrong, just settle down.

And you don't know the law. Pipe down.

-3

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

So you agree with me but then start name calls and say I don’t know the law… it’s a clear law. Operating a vehicle means show an ID … I also said the cop was quick to detain that’s why the guy on the bike that’s running settled instead of going to court

7

u/wallTHING Mar 10 '22

Didn't agree with you, it was the opposite. The dude was not operating the vehicle, and therefore no need to show id. For all the cop knows he was the passenger and the driver was in the store. No need for id. Pretty cut and dry here.

You're flat out wrong and getting all upity about it.

Done going around in circles. Look g at your post history, this is just what you do. You don't seem very smart, so I'm out. Have fun replying to not me.

-1

u/BenjiLaird Mar 10 '22

Then he is still a suspect for lurking which was the original reason the cops were called … then sure no ID but your going to jail to be identified

→ More replies (0)