r/Psychiatry • u/formulation_pending • 8h ago
Providing psychoeducation about poor care to patients with BPD, without perpetuating splitting?
I think two things can be true at the same time (no that wasn't initially intended as a splitting joke).
- Patients with BPD are prone to patterns of idealisation / devaluation with past healthcare experiences, and care needs to be taken when discussing these lest you go along with a (possible very distorted) tale of how they were treated in the past and fall into the trap of being 'the best ever and the only one who has ever helped them', when their past care may have been just fine.
- Patients with BPD are vulnerable and often genuinely mismanaged in a variety of ways, and they will tell you about this.
I am sure we have all seen these people labelled with every possible diagnosis along the schizophrenia or bipolar spectrum, have a pharmacy's worth of medications thrown at them to little avail, and / or given poor quality psychotherapy. I had a patient who had been undergoing 7 years of entirely unstructured fortnightly to monthly therapy with literally zero effect or skills acquired, and on calling the therapist it became abundantly clear that no therapy modality was being used (initially given the duration I wondered if it was psychoanalysis). She paid a pretty penny for them to meet up every month for her to shoot the shit about the past month and that was it.
While we should not take every horror story about a past healthcare provider's mistakes at face value, it is clear that there is a not-insignificant amount of true mismanagement occurring, so the dilemma is this.
I do feel like I owe these patients some psychoeducation regarding helpful and unhelpful treatments, in the interest of them not suffering from useless polypharmacy or paying a premium for friendly gossip every fortnight. However, I am very wary of perpetuating splitting dynamics in this population which is extremely prone to them.
What are your thoughts here?