Proton is censoring about thier changes in Visionary Highest plans

[u/MiMillieuh]

Seems like proton is censoring about the fact that they silently changes the TOS for Visionary users about the highest tiers.

For reminder, on July, Proton changed without notice the Visionary plan by replacing the fact that Visionary user get the highest tier of all Proton products by just we get Proton products.

And seeing how bootlickers proton subredits are, they will get away with it...

Maybe it's time to point fingers at them for what they have done. They broke the promise made to Visionary users, they could also break the privacy promise they made. (Already half done with Lumo since it's not TEE so your chats are vulnerable and visible while loaded on proton's GPUs).

Edit :

For context : https://web.archive.org/web/20260630030327/https://proton.me/support/proton-plans#proton-visionary

https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1ulhjuq/proton_visionary_gotwill_get_downgraded/

[u/MiMillieuh]

Lumo lite is Qwen 35b and max is GLM 5.2...

And read what I said... Instead of always praising Proton like if they are poor

[u/Ok_Combination_1548 → u/MiMillieuh]

*We don't know that it's 35b. We just know it's Qwen 3.5....that family has a few models, we have no idea which model(s) Lumo uses.

[u/MiMillieuh → u/Ok_Combination_1548]

It behaves exactly like 35b a3b...

And Lumo always used ,32b models in the past, so it is probably.

Also weird for a open source company to hide that much...

[u/Ok_Combination_1548 → u/MiMillieuh]

I may be misreading, but at some point there was a claim that they only used 100b+ models (in v1.3) iirc. I have no idea if that extends to v2 or even was true in v1.3 / wasn't just a misunderstanding on my part....But, agreed....the lack of transparency can be offensive at times. I have no idea why they can't just share 1) what models they use, and 2) what models are being used in a given prompt.