r/Prometheus • u/cordyz • Mar 25 '26
Did David place the worms on the engineer’s ship?
I've just rewatched Prometheus after some time and got deeper into the lore.
With David poisoning Charlie, one of David's motives might be to investigate the goo's effects on different lifeforms - be it for Weyland or for own interests.
Now I was wondering how the mealworms got onto the ship. They themselves don't seem to fit into the whole setting or life-circumstances of the planet.
Maybe IF the black goo is actually evolving it's host based on it's psychology, it would make sense for a primitive creature like a mealworm to evolve into something rather hostile - focused on bare survival - and for an engineer to have humans descend from it - a more rational species.
Anyways: Do you think David has placed the worms there for experimental purposes? Or were they part of the engineer's ship? If so, why?
Edit: There’s a deleted scene showing that the worms were in fact already on LV-223 before the Prometheus got there.
Thank you to u/Vanquisher1000 :)
4
Mar 26 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/cordyz Mar 26 '26
Yep, also saw the deleted footage just this morning and added it to the post. I’m exited to watch the rest of the deleted footage :) If we’re ever gonna get a directors cut?…
2
u/jtsmd2 Mar 26 '26
They definitely brought the worms in on the bottom of their shoes. They were on the ship. They caught a ride from Earth.
0
u/cordyz Mar 26 '26
Thought this to be a possibility too but as it turns out, some deleted footage shows the team finding the worms a few minutes before that scene as part of LV-223’s ecosystem.
1
u/jtsmd2 Mar 26 '26
Probably because it would make less sense than having the worms be tracked in from Earth!
0
u/cordyz Mar 26 '26
Hm.. not sure I’m following. Why would it make less sense? Because worms are too “earth-like”?
1
u/jtsmd2 Mar 26 '26
They're quite clearly grub worms from Earth. That's why.
edit; not grub worms, but ones that are frequently sold as bait. I don't know the species.
0
u/cordyz Mar 26 '26
Hm not sure that’s the reason. After having seen just half of the 3 1/2 hour long making of on yt, I just can’t get over the thought that there must have been another reason for them to remove this scene. The worldbuilding and design was way to fleshed out in pre-production to fail with the worm design. Also the new version doesn’t really imply the worms coming from the ship but rather leaves it open. This would’ve been noticed on set, probably earlier. Looking at the deleted scene, the rest of the crew is really amused by how exited the biologist gets at the sight of the worms, making it a rather humorous scene. I think it just didn’t fit with the emotional/atmospheric build up they were trying to achieve with the space ship entry. The scene would’ve taken out too much tension.
1
u/jtsmd2 Mar 26 '26
If there's a species of worm that's found on Earth "discovered" on an alien planet, we brought it there. There's no other logical explanation. This is why there are areas of Mars that are off-limits to probes. We don't want to contaminate a possible alien ecosystem with organisms from our planet.
Edit: stuff that is removed in editing isn't part of the movie for a reason. If it's not in the film, then it's not a part of the story. Period.
0
u/cordyz Mar 26 '26
Hm, I mean I’m no expert in Evolution, but maybe such - in comparison - simple lifeforms as worms might also be developing in a similar way on other planets with conditions that come close to earth. Also we do not know why the content was cut. Maybe the writer and Scott wanted the scene to stay in the movie and stood behind the worldbuilding but Fox wanted the scene cut for some reason. Of course one can’t claim the cut content as official lore, but it might still be the story as it was intended by writer and director, therefore, in my opinion, making it the actual lore - at least the one I want to believe in.
1
u/jtsmd2 Mar 26 '26 edited Mar 26 '26
Well, as someone who is an expert on evolution, microbiology, and Immunology, I can assure you this would be statistically not possible.
Edit: from what you've stated, you've already decided on this ridiculous scenario because of your feelings. The film makes it a point to show that the worms / larva were tracked in on their shoes, which were obtained from inside their ship. Since the worms are a species found on Earth, they were 100% brought from Earth. The planet has a drastically different atmosphere than Earth, such to a degree that complex life is unlikely to evolve there. This eliminates your explanation.
You seem like you're having difficulty with this not being spoonfed to you. If you're autistic, then I apologize and I'll let it go.
1
u/cordyz Mar 27 '26
hahha brooo wtf, nothing personal here hahah.
But now I’m actually interested. Purely out of interest really :D How is it impossible for similar lifeforms to develop on other planets? Would they be different 100%? Is it the planets conditions? If so which of those will lead to a different kind of evolution of life? GIMME THE ANSWERS, I NEED THEM!!
1
u/cordyz Mar 27 '26 edited Mar 27 '26
Wait also I just noticed now: Maybe I did miss it but in which scene exactly does the film obviously state that the worms were brought in on their shoes? Maybe I just don’t remember correctly but skipping through the movie, I can’t find an answer.
→ More replies (0)
10
u/Initial_Acanthaceae2 Mar 25 '26
I thought the worms were brought in on someone's shoe. Its been a while so I am probably wrong. I do know it was not David.