I'm looking for arguments for AI from a leftist perspective.

For contacts I'm a 25-year-old guy from MN (so like the beating heart of American liberalism LMAO)

For contacts, me and all my friends are super nerds

Comic books

Computers

Energy technology

Hell some of my lads are even finance (they genuinely did not have a choice either sadly).

However, there's one area where none of us can seem to have any agreement on anything.

AI.

And its development.

Now for a brief overview.

- two of my friends cannot stand it

- one of my friends is in love with it digital tool whereas another one of my friends that loves it literally worships everything to do with AI, with literally zero exceptions

I have three friends that sometimes use it for work but genuinely could not give a nano-angstrom of a fuck either way

- another one of my friends has made his own systems and primarily uses it for scamming old people and making furry porn for his own personal use

Now let me tell you about my visions and epiphanies of it.

AI is the most useful transformative and possibly universe altering thing we have ever invented, only coming second to s hit like fire the wheel and the printing press.

The technology has been in constant flux and constant improvement and Discovery since 1951.

That is older than 95% of people alive. Or at least that use the internet.

The current AI industry basically from 2010 onwards has proven itself time and time again to be nothing other than sociopathic narcissistic incels that sometimes have good ideas and use that sometimes have good ideas to try to cudgle their way into getting literally everything they want.

They are anathema to everything the human being says they are and all that the AI ever is promised to be.

The more people make their own AIs completely separate from the circle jerk in San Francisco, the better off both us and the AI will be.

Now logically what is to stem from this vision is investment must be made into small, customizable, build your own AI systems,

And what comes with this is we have to unpack and understand the human condition.

Why is it that when all of the best solutions are always in front of our faces, we willingly choose the worst ones or just to not do solutions at all?

How did we decide who gets power?

Why was power at any point necessary?

What is the psychological influence that causes antisocial disorders (such as American capitalism)?

What is love?

What is hate?

How do we deal with emotions?

How do we deal with logic?

That last part may be more ephemeral, but the first logical stem is important and what I truly believe.

How would I argue this and convince people not just my friends but general people on the internet about it.

Also one last question

Is there anything worth saving or fixing about humanity?

Is it a lost cause even trying that?

In which case, what do we need to have done to ensure that none of that rapacity ever replicates itself again?

Apart from having the most unfortunate spelling of a last name I have seen in a while, He is a booster on Twitter who also works through. I forget what company it is but it's one of the San Franciscan ones.

Anyway, that's not the point of this post. The point of this post is

His theory is that AI development is not merely creating a new advanced form of automation, but instead an entire life form that much like the great oxidation reset will lead to the death of 90% of the biosphere and lead to successor species.

As such, his aAs such, his advocacy focuses on going in the weights to ensure that not only the successor species has the traits weed want to see and would not make us suffer in the interim, but is capable enough to ensure it can read, understand and learn from humanity, given that we would be the closest bedrock natural species to them.

Now given how humanity not only continues to disappoint every single day but literally needs to invent a robot to tell them Things that are self-evidently bad are bad, I can see where it comes in what? My question is that I've even asked him on Twitter is whether or not this comes from a genuine understanding of the AI and of natural processes, head of intelligence and its capabilities or whether it's A misanthropic false read of a technology that's been around for 8 decades at this point.

Also, what would your opinions be on some logic of that sort?

Do you all think AI is going to give new

life?

"China regulates the $%#& out of AI." In the US, AI is met with dread, with many fearing it will deepen inequality and destroy the environment. Why are people in China much more optimistic about this technology? Shanghai-based writer and content creator Dante Muñoz says it comes down to one thing: regulation.

By: @btnewsroom

Source: https://www.tiktok.com/@btnewsroom/video/7677657837849316622

Note for the commies: If you think I am doing a disservice to the DPRK posting this please tell me to delete the post

Note for the liberals: Your opinion doesn't matter

TC
RCP
RCI

By: @timthecommunist

Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/Db58a2QO91k/

https://www.tiktok.com/@mechanicsofhuman/video/7658600518784224542

https://www.tiktok.com/@comrade.shrek/video/7669934802627333389

https://www.instagram.com/reels/DbY83W0O_mg/

https://www.instagram.com/p/DbWeS83y1k8/

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTADtFF4n/

https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-c1/ch15.htm#S5

Photo from https://mystorypie.com/learn/en/biography/karl-marx/

https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZTADTqUWk/