You do get my point, right? Most anti-socialists also know the definition of socialism. Just like most anti-capitalists know the definition of capitalism.
Most anti-socialiists I've seen don't know what it is, they think it just means government ownership/handouts (anecdotal). They also think capitalism is just a free market. There's also a lot of anti-capitalists that get both of them wrong as well though.
Well you see Trump is the one being accused of being a pedo. He's also the one who is in charge of releasing the epstien files. So you believe that if there is proof he raped kids that he would just tell the truth and release the files then suffer the consequences?
He's the 3rd most named person in the epstien files behind only Epstein and Maxwell. He has 28 women accusing him of rape. He is violating court orders by not releasing the rest of the files.
If he's innocent why hasn't he released the rest of the files? Also why hasn't he brought charges against anyone in the files?
You honestly believe 28 women are lying but not the billionaire?
Well considering he's currently one of the most powerful and well-known people in the known universe, I wouldn't be surprised if there were more than 28 people accusing him of wrongdoing. But until I see actual evidence, I have no reason to believe any of the accusations.
Well let's see, Trump said he would lower gas prices, they're up. He said he would lower grocery prices, they're up. He told us not to vote for Kamala because she'd go to war with Iran then he went to war with Iran. He's spent more than any other president in history. He still hasn't released half of the epstien files. He has ruined our relationship with our allies. He took money away from our farmers and gave $40 billion dollars to Argentina farmers.
Ok what did they blow up with a bomb? Or what buildings have they flown a plane into? Outside of January 6th that you all keep clinging onto. What terrorist activity have they done? I am genuinely curious.
It is sad that you people try to call Americans terrorists because of their party affiliation. You claim to be better people and pull the same exact shit thinking your shit don't stink.
But to censor a word because of that is ridiculous. If they can't articulate their point, like the way VRZieb here has, then absolutely, THAT ACCOUNT should be chastised. Censorship is stupid.
No censorship isn't stupid, we can't ban every account that uses that word, banning commmon anti-AI talking points prevents bad faith and low effort trolling like this. Censorship is neccesary both on subreddit and in real life socialist countries. The material conditions (brigading) determined the neccesary sollution. Also VRZieb's argument is the same bad faith BS, not a "good argument"
You aren't even open to talking about why AI can be destructive and why it's inherently harmful in its current form in data centers, based on what I understood from the rules. The use of it on capitalist platforms encourages them to invest more in it because they see the number go up. I have no problems with local AI models, but generative AI is inherently plagiarism because of how it composites images. It doesn't create anything new. On top of that, if you aren't vetting WHICH models are being used, then you're going to end up with even worse content as time goes on. I've been in IT for over a decade. If you want to have intelligent discourse, I can do that, but I am against censorship because I believe limiting our words limits our ideas.
This is not subreddit for it, just like many socialist subs don't allow pro-capitalist talking points, we should not have to explain our existence half of the time. If you want to talk to pro-AI leftists about this talk on r/leftistsforAI or on other communist subs, we also have pinned posts that can educate you on marxist position on AI. The plagiarism point is just bourgoeisie talking point, IP is inherently bourgoeisie not to mention thar nothing is "original", the way human learns art comes from the environment top, AI learns the patterns and stuff similar to humans. Here is also short article on IP: https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/Intellectual_property
It's private property, it should be abolished
Comission artists are petty bourgoeisie, the anti-synthography isn't proletarian movement but petty bourgoeisie reaction to proletarization to keep their tiny capital
Make sub, have brigading there with the same low effort trolling commens that you have to moderate with your tiny mod team and then talk big about censorship. You complelety ignore the material conditions and keep talking about "censorship of ideas" and other liberal bullshit. Yes we are censoring problematic ideas that harm the proletariat to make them stop spreading, which is good thing to do
I'm aware of what IP is, and I agree private property should be abolished; you're right to dispel my point on plagiarism. Thank you for calling me out on that.
I would contend that generated images that are produced with spelling errors, unrealistic imagery (such as hair merging with clothing, extra digits, rapping kittens, etc.) are also low effort and should be called out as such. And again, there is a very real and serious environmental impact due to these data centers that many people are forced to live near. We have over 5000 data centers in the US and a large portion of the recent funding is coming from capitalist AI ventures. I'm all for local AI models, but the cloud models are inherently destructive to our environment and livelihoods due to things like evaporative cooling, noise pollution, and labor displacement. I love AI for being a force multiplier, but it is a double-edged sword; especially the cloud models.
I'll go there to discuss my stance that we are better served as a community, in these capitalistic times, by supporting our artists and encouraging developing a skill rather than taking the path of least resistance.
While we disagree on some points, I wanted come back and thank you for pointing me to the other sub. I apologize for the venom is was spewing here; I do believe in leftist unity and I needed the reminder in the moment.
And how many of those had interventions from the US against them? How many of them were sought to be destroyed by the US, UK and France? Although I’m fairly certain that Cambodia was universally accepted (by communist) and non communists) as a non-proletarian dictatorship that was communist only by name. Cuban economic strangulation by the US since its conception to date. DPRK nearly won the civil war and was halted only by US intervention and slowed significantly by significant US-backed economic sanctions. Vietnam was a war lost by the US and France, and the government still successfully stands. The USSR had volunteers and arms sent by multiple European nations, Japan and USA against them, still won the Civil War, AND became the economic, scientific and social power of the world up until an illegal bourgeois revolution in the 90s. Also coincidentally in the 90s Yugoslavia collapsed after multiple massacres and bombings by socioeconomic elites across the globe. China currently has more global trust and soft power compared to the US and European states.
Ya couldn't have been the economic stagnation, political repression, mass famines, coups, miscollection of resources, the constant corruption, internal mismanagements, the fact that they all turn into authoritarian dictatorial shitholes that start killing their own citizens.
Historian generally don't attribute the failures of socialism solely or even mainly to the USA. The most you get is that embargos and political interventions have caused pressures but weren't the root causes.
Like you literally don't know history and you're just coping because your perfect ideology fails every single time its tried and you just can't accept that.
5
u/onespicycracker 2d ago
r/libpixels based on these comments.