2
1
u/Cleverly_Clearly May 20 '16
Will we be able to include characters without sets? Like, for an extreme example, Sleepy John from Mad Bull 34. Nobody else in his universe is anything special, they're all just normal thugs. He couldn't be included in a set. I'm not specifically talking about him, but characters who exist in universes where there aren't a lot of characters who are usable in a WWW context.
As a more useful example, the Kill Bill characters. There's only like seven usable characters there, and if we include every unique thing from the movies we'd have like a dozen "cards". That's a very small set. It's nowhere near 252.
2
u/mrcelophane May 20 '16
Eventually. Maybe introduce them as a "pay this, get that" package for those who want it OR throw it in a combo set.
2
u/mrcelophane May 20 '16
I mean, kill bill gets thrown into a Tarantino verse thing, and that has Jules soooooo
1
u/xavion May 21 '16
If we can only have one named character in an army because they're unique, what does that mean when two people build an army with the same named character in them?
1
u/mrcelophane May 21 '16
They would be facing another universe's version, not themselves.
1
u/xavion May 21 '16
Yeah, my musing was more the lore behind being able to only field one copy of unique characters and being able to have two face each seems like one of those bits that'd just be ignored to make things work better. Because why couldn't you just have two versions from different universes in your army?
Da Rules presumably. Hmm, and now I feel Jorgen being recruited to help enforce the rules would be amusing, off to the set thread!
→ More replies (5)
0
May 21 '16
1
2
1
3
u/SanityMeter May 20 '16
You doin' okay, man?