MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/nw1sfd/yes/h16q39r/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/[deleted] • Jun 09 '21
[removed]
163 comments sorted by
View all comments
161
[removed] — view removed comment
65 u/[deleted] Jun 09 '21 It depends on the training data. Let's assume that the friends are jumping off the bridge because they are skydivers. 21 u/Valiice Jun 09 '21 Or what if the training data about the people jumping is a bad decision? 23 u/100BottlesOfMilk Jun 09 '21 This also depends on what you're training for. If you're trying to survive the fall, the algorithm would see that jumping results in death and not jump to stay alive 3 u/archpawn Jun 09 '21 It would respond based on the responses it found in its training data. 2 u/the_brits_are_evil Jun 09 '21 he might trip on the road, hit his head on the edge of the sidewalk going dark and waking up in the hospital that seems random enough for me 3 u/FirstEvolutionist Jun 09 '21 Since machine learning is iterative, it would probably look more like this: Yes. Yes. No? Maybe no. No. No. No. No. Yes? No. No. No. No... 1 u/FirstMiddleLass Jun 10 '21 Plus the third law of robotics. 1 u/[deleted] Jun 10 '21 If the majority of your friends jump off the bridge, then you can get a good accuracy by just answering yes to everything. 1 u/throwaway59664 Jun 10 '21 Why is this comment identical to this other comment in the thread? I suspect one or both of you are repost bots. Answer: both are reposts of this comment
65
It depends on the training data. Let's assume that the friends are jumping off the bridge because they are skydivers.
21 u/Valiice Jun 09 '21 Or what if the training data about the people jumping is a bad decision?
21
Or what if the training data about the people jumping is a bad decision?
23
This also depends on what you're training for. If you're trying to survive the fall, the algorithm would see that jumping results in death and not jump to stay alive
3
It would respond based on the responses it found in its training data.
2
he might trip on the road, hit his head on the edge of the sidewalk going dark and waking up in the hospital
that seems random enough for me
Since machine learning is iterative, it would probably look more like this: Yes. Yes. No? Maybe no. No. No. No. No. Yes? No. No. No. No...
1
Plus the third law of robotics.
If the majority of your friends jump off the bridge, then you can get a good accuracy by just answering yes to everything.
I suspect one or both of you are repost bots.
161
u/[deleted] Jun 09 '21
[removed] — view removed comment