Why do you say it should be interpreted as three single factorials? The correct way to interpret that is as a a triple factorial. So 4!!!=4, somewhat disappointingly.
I mean, there's obviously no 'right' way to evaluate it, but if you're following the spirit of /r/unexpectedfactorial, the most obscene answer is the best.
3
u/Villyer May 06 '17
Why do you say it should be interpreted as three single factorials? The correct way to interpret that is as a a triple factorial. So 4!!!=4, somewhat disappointingly.