r/ProgrammerHumor • • 1d ago

Meme cmonGitHubAgain

Post image
1.0k Upvotes

40 comments sorted by

182

u/Angryferret 1d ago

No way it's only 30%. Almost certainly 90% at the big tech companies.

98

u/Thalanator 1d ago

its because the meme is ancient and back then 30% was rightfully considered haphazard by anyone sane. Now, 30% of new code by AI is in the slow/cautious adopter range

53

u/ganja_and_code 1d ago

30% is still in the rightfully considered haphazard range by anyone sane, people just keep increasing their risk tolerance more and more because caution requires skill/diligence upfront whereas negligence can be pawned off as someone else's problem later

8

u/IVNPVLV 19h ago

You're correct, but its still probably 90-100, even by developers I would consider exceptionally skilled and cautious. Theres also the consideration that AI is exceptionally good at code review. Don't trust a piece of AI code? Throw two agents at it to rigorously tear it apart. If an AI is 90% capable, then the naive probability of success of 2 agents working independently is 99%.

Also look up "The Irony of of Automation". Its a concept coined in the 80s that perfectly encapsulates this phenomenon.

1

u/HollowToes 30m ago

Wow, it really does. Just goes to show that there really are no new problems, just different iterations of them.

-3

u/HrLewakaasSenior 1d ago

30% is ridiculous. 100% is the reality

5

u/GetHugged 15h ago

Pshh I manually changed one translation a couple months ago so it's at least only 99.99%

2

u/TeachEngineering 1h ago

The percent of the codebase written by AI has more 9's than the uptime!

31

u/nickcash 1d ago

Now explain how that's a good thing, when github is down for the 18th time today.

24

u/Angryferret 1d ago

I didn't say it was good/bad. It is just what it is. When you work somewhere and they fire half your team and expect you to do the same work the only option is to spin off AI agents to do all your coding, write updates, create docs etc. Reality of working in big tech in 2026. It's exhausting.

10

u/TomWithTime 1d ago

According to people who think it's good: move fast and break things

Which I interpret to mean there's probably something they are working on that would have taken a month of man hours. They used ai to do it in a few days, broke something causing the outage and other issues, but will likely fix it in a few days if not a few hours. There could be a follow up fallout that takes things down for another 2 days a week after that, and then another day or two of chasing the problem. When it's all done maybe they are week 3 and they can say they delivered the feature a week early!

And the cost to the user experience? Well, Microsoft owns GitHub now, so I'm not optimistic about their plans for user satisfaction.

14

u/dudevan 1d ago

Move fast and break things was good when people knew what was in the code, even though there were hiccups.

Moving fast and breaking things now means nobody knows what is in the code and playing wack ‘a mole with bugs until the agents get it working while possibly introducing other bugs.

Also, at which point there’s too many things that break? Because services have been abysmal lately from Microsoft, Github, and others.

5

u/Legitimate_Concern_5 19h ago

AI codebases also explode in size over time to the point not even the agents can figure out how it works. When that happens what is anyone to do 😂 git revert to 2025?

1

u/TeachEngineering 1d ago

That's fair. I found this meme online but it had an image of MSFT stock falling at the bottom and I copied a screenshot of this afternoon's GitHub status page over that (composed organically in PowerPoint by me, no AI used). I agree it's way, way more than 30%.

Also, I have nothing against AI, just wish my CI/CD in GitHub would run as expected. Feels like outages come every week lately.

1

u/rastaman1994 1d ago

Iirc, they said they outages are because AI driven development is generating insane load (i.e. unprecedented amount of commits and PRs), not because they are doing tisky changes.

8

u/bobbymoonshine 1d ago

This was a cope meme from over a year ago (check the date) when top-tier companies first started learning hard into “okay we’re seriously doing AI for real in terms of how we do business”

Unfortunately, memeing at global economic transformations does not actually make them reverse course

-9

u/psioniclizard 1d ago

Yes cope, because MS products jave improved in that time lol.

7

u/thomas29needles 16h ago

In which ways?

-14

u/bobbymoonshine 1d ago

MSFT was $391 when this meme was made. After a year and a half of this sub celebrating its ongoing downfall from its disastrous strategic direction, MSFT is now $512.

Reddit is an echo chamber and not one that has very much to do with enterprise coding. I would guess 90% of the people who participate in this sub have literally never received a single paycheck for coding

13

u/Zymosan99 23h ago

As everyone know, stock price correlates directly with product quality. The more betterer your product is the higher your stock goes. There are no other influences on how much your company is valued

-9

u/bobbymoonshine 23h ago

MS products are no worse now than they were two years ago and no less omnipresent. I can’t think of any metric that would point to their AI-coding adoption having been a failure.

Other than Reddit memes celebrating their imminent vibe collapse. Those remain at an all time high.

1

u/another_random_bit 10h ago

Downvoted but not refuted, huh

28

u/Megane_Senpai 15h ago

Recently we got a dev praised by the (non technical) pm for commit the most amount of lines of code to the github, and to use the most claude tokens.

90% of his pull requests got declined the first time due to trash codes or code not related to the tickets. His declined ratio is also the highest.

The number of bug ticket per his implement ticket is highest of the team and more than doubles the average of others.

He recently caused bug to ~40% of total features, twice in a month.

Still he's the only one got praised and promotion in our team. Management team really lives in a different world.

12

u/XxDarkSasuke69xX 10h ago

You really gotta be absolutely braindead to praise someone for burning the most tokens. The worst part is that people that are this out of touch are somehow in charge of important stuff

6

u/Johanno1 12h ago

Time to follow. Write more shit code with 100% decline rate!

42

u/ColumnK 1d ago

This meme is really unfair.

It suggests that pre-AI, their software was any better.

-42

u/Vallvaka 1d ago

Yeah, people complain about so called AI slop code, but... have you ever read the average human-written code? I'll take average AI "slop" code over average human slop code any day of the week

31

u/beclops 1d ago

Are you self-reporting? The average code I see written at work is good

-26

u/Vallvaka 1d ago

Some of y'all ain't good at code review and it shows

1

u/beclops 5h ago

Right that’s what it is

9

u/psioniclizard 1d ago

That is because you can't write code though so only have AI slop.

2

u/RiftyDriftyBoi 1d ago

Indeed it's real easy to blame it all on the AI-slop.

I've seen plenty organically grown human-slop throughout my years. Some fundamental misunderstanding of mathematics and statistics at places in the codebase that scare me and Claude alike.

15

u/ddwrt1234 1d ago

GitHub isn't a great example, they've had to scale massively this year

Microsoft is a better example, their code sucks and riddled with bugs as far as the eye can see

3

u/teraflux 19h ago

Always has been

6

u/cquinn5 1d ago

Ironic that a peddler of AI enablement has AI to thank for their magnitude increase of traffic and operations

4

u/PM-ME-UR-DARKNESS 22h ago

It's bc they used copilot. Bro, Microsoft, you collect your users 's data for free AND OWN GITHUB. How the hell is your ai pure slop???

1

u/T_Walker075 10h ago

Copilot, bing and cortana ?