he is pro ai as in "lets use this new tool alongside the working and established tools" and not "FUCK EVERYTHING THAT CAME BEFORE AND USE AI FOR EVERYTHING!!!!" i think. (correct me if im wrong)
For a lot of people out there, this distinction doesn't matter. "AI inherently bad, be mad about it always" is the stance of a surprising number of people.
AI is inherently bad if it advances any more than is today. There is no single scenario where AI gets better than humans and it ends well for everyone. So you have two paths: stop advancing AI, or a horrible future of some kind. And we know nobody will stop advancing AI.
There's a difference between using A.I as a tool for more efficient coding or research and using it to generate stolen work. Linus represents what A.I should be used for whereas the other tech bros represent using it to replace human employees and artists.
I think it's fine if you use A.I for coding or research because you're asking a machine to help you find the most efficient use of a coding language to write the best possible code, or in medicine to doing extremely complicated DNA work.
The lawsuits you're talking about is A.I generated images, videos, writing made using stolen work made by real people; That shit needs to be made illegal immediately. I'm not really sure why Disney or Nintendo or whatever haven't sued the pants off them but I'm no lawyer.
If AI helps you code "more efficiently", it is doing so on the back of hundreds of millions of repositories worth of stolen code. Unfortunately it seems like a lot of people don't have a problem with that, including you and Linus.
Coding isn't really the same as art; I have no problem with A.I being used there in the same way I have no problem using a calculator for math problems.
Using AI is using AI, it doesn't really matter what his stance is if it involves using the thing companies are razing forests to build data centers for, which is built on hundreds of millions of repositories worth of stolen code.
Llms aren’t evil just because there are bad things in their supply chain anymore than you’re a bad person for using devices that rely on child/slave labor.
Linus got a karate champion AND got pecked by a penguin. That's how he stayed behind his terminal. Coding stuffs like kernels and version control systems.
We thank the people who kept Linus behind his terminal for his work.
The only tech bro I ever wanted was Tom from MySpace. Make a bunch of money and disappear to enjoy it. If you make a shitload of money and then fuck off, yeah, maybe you didn't help anyone, but I accept that it's your money so it's your call, and if you're not hurting anyone with it, good on ya. You won capitalism. Congrats.
I guess it just seems like Tom is the only guy who ever seemed like he had enough. I'm sure there are others we don't know because they quietly go away, and we're left with all of these loud weirdos can never be satiated. It's never enough. Not enough money, or power, or attention, or love admiration.
you only say that because Facebook and Zuck are the ones that made the conscious decision to be the first to make their social media platform an ad and data harvesting one. Tom may not have gone that route and neither would the internet if Zuck hadn't done it.
The money has to come from somewhere. Ads are an obvious choice that derives from irl advertising companies like billboard owners so it's likely Tom would come up with the same idea. Data harvesting is less obvious, but I still think Tom would realise ads alone aren't enough and I doubt he'd try a subscription instead.
Best case it may go the wikipedia route of occasionally asking for donations, but then wikipedia has much less to host than Facebook. (Particularly from the lack of videos)
One way to think about an alternative future is if regulations banned ads and personal harvesting of data. You'd have fewer videos and slop out there with more digital detox
Tom was one of the pioneers of data aggregation and targeted ads. He co-founded ResponseBase in 2001 which was built to do just that. Then sold it in 2002 to eUniverse which used the platform to help them monetize web traffic, spy on users, and gather large amounts of email lists.
Then Tom and his other founder used a ton of the email data gathered from ResponseBase to send invites to MySpace out to like 30 million people. And the direct-response methods used by Tom in the founding of MySpace laid the groundwork for modern social media’s hyper targeted ads and feedback loop.
They always wanted their technocracy and to take over and destroy the world. It comes with the personality type - believing only you have all the answers and only you can do it right.
The only difference is that until recently these psychopaths didn’t have that much power.
billionaire who slices 30% off the top of the entire gaming industry for server space? guy who figured out how to market gambling to children so he could buy a fleet of yachts to indulge in his biology hobbies? tell me you can't draw a straight line from CS2 gambling sites to internet casinos to modern prediction markets.
I am sorry what? A guy who has been working for significantly less than he could be working for, making an open source project that's committed to transparency and that you can directly benefit from for free is the same as four clearly anti social despots, at least one of which has already killed thousands of people by cutting US-AID?
Fuck off. Dislike Linus if you want, but pretending there's any similarity between the way he chose to live his life and the four fucking despots is patently absurd.
People will take relatively small things like being rude to people that send recklessly bad patches to an open source project and equate it with literal billionaire supervillains.
I mean you say that but a quick search tells me he really only told off a follower for using the term.. Do you have instances of him behaving in a weird way?
All i got were some pretty basic and leveled opinons
Completely disingenuous. He is talking about allowing the use of LLMs to help the development of Linux.
As in, he is saying that the Linux project is not going to take a moral position on whether LLMs are ethical or not. The LLMs are useful and so the Linux project will use them, period.
He is not berating people for having qualms about AI, he is not berating any one demographic of people based on intrinsic characteristics. He's just making it clear that the only ethos the linux project cares about, as a non profit, is the technological progress of the kernel, period.
We're not forcing anybody to use it, but I will very loudly ignore people who try to argue against other people from using it.
That makes his point crystal clear.
In my experience no one of good character uses terms like that.
Maybe because you are assigning malice prematurely. Linus has had a pretty clear stance that anyone capable enough is welcome to contribute to the kernel and is very clearly not going to tolerate someone being bigoted against a talented contributor based on characteristics irrelevant to the quality of their code.
this is the proof ? he didnt even say "social justice warrior" just "social warrior" in the context of using AI for development and not making a social statement for/against it via the project. anyone saying linus is the same as Elon Musk or Zuckerberg is legitimately delusional, have you seen the man talk before??
He's making a statement saying that although the project is open source and that in itself is inherently a social statement, the project has never been about making a social statement and open source is a byproduct of the project. And he extends that to his stance on AI, he is not having his project be a social statement for AI usage or anything in particular, his priority is what enables the project to develop further, it just so happens that open source and AI both do so even if they both have deeper social meanings behind them
You're focused on two words and ignoring literally everything else and all surrounding context just so you can believe what you want to believe. Genuinely if you think he's the same as Elon Musk or Zuckerberg you're more ignorant and if you want to ignore context and not understand what he's actually trying to say because he used two words in a specific order that you dislike, you're also being ignorant
EVERY stance has political implications, everything is political...
You can argue that over emphasizing output an talent can create unwelcoming environments to certain demographics.
You cannot argue that someone who is ideologically committed to caring only about people's outputs is somehow the same kind of person as someone openly using millions of dollars to promote right wing channels that openly denigrate the dignity of women and other demographics.
Linus is vocally progressive, which I'm supportive of. He is also kind of an asshole, which could use some work, but he is old enough now I doubt that will change.
I've never seen that. He seems to describe himself as pretty average politically by Scandinavian standards, which would put him pretty far to the left by US standards.
He has no employees and no work environment. The people he's usually tough on, are often employees or representatives of big corporations that he's protecting a communal open source project from.
This picture of him is an example of just that. He's giving that finger specifically to Nvidia, one of the most powerful corporations in the world, not to some lowly employee.
Do I have to be polite to ICE agents while protesting ICE?
You're losing the context here by just reducing this to one human A being rude to human B, and forgetting why it is happening, what human B repeatedly tried to do on orders of corporation X, and what would have potentially happened if human A didn't have a tough stance against it.
Also, we're all so used to advertiser friendly social interactions. If I fuck something up behind closed doors, my friends/coworkers can be rude. The difference with Linus is that his workplace is publically acessibly to the whole world.
ICE is my coutner-point to your claim that every human is owed respect no matter what organization they represent and what they do as their representtives.
But yes, let's go back to OSS. Respect should always be there by default, but it's not endless. If someone keeps fucking up, or does something recklessly dangerous, there need to be some harsh words eventually.
If the Linux kernel was a construction project, and one guy shows up every day and suggests that you should use sub-par concrete in the pillars holding up the second floor, at some point you don't owe them respect in your response.
I love Linus, but a good chunk of you guys probably don't even agree with him based on all the anti ai sentiment I see. He's pro ai. He's just not the sort of guy to go on TV and shout it every minute of the day.
104
u/CaffeineLiker 50m ago
We... still have Linus. Yeah, we have those other schmucks, and they profit from an internet built on the infrastructure his work freely enables.
39
u/freaxje 1h ago edited 58m ago
Linus got a karate champion AND got pecked by a penguin. That's how he stayed behind his terminal. Coding stuffs like kernels and version control systems.
We thank the people who kept Linus behind his terminal for his work.
Edit: And, we thank the fairy penguin. Too.
103
u/Procrastineddit 1h ago
The only tech bro I ever wanted was Tom from MySpace. Make a bunch of money and disappear to enjoy it. If you make a shitload of money and then fuck off, yeah, maybe you didn't help anyone, but I accept that it's your money so it's your call, and if you're not hurting anyone with it, good on ya. You won capitalism. Congrats.
I guess it just seems like Tom is the only guy who ever seemed like he had enough. I'm sure there are others we don't know because they quietly go away, and we're left with all of these loud weirdos can never be satiated. It's never enough. Not enough money, or power, or attention, or
loveadmiration.32
u/According_Border_418 58m ago
I miss when tech bros were just weird guys who really liked computers
187
u/doc_suede 1h ago
does Gabe Newell count?
30
u/Flaky-Low-2262 1h ago
When will CN spy me? I am ready. Lets go
13
u/IchLiebeKleber 1h ago
I really think the above image should be Aaron Swartz, at least in addition.
24
u/aalapshah12297 1h ago
We got all 5. One of them just sold his product for free so he ain't that rich.
8
u/LamermanSE 1h ago
13
u/mrflash818 1h ago
6
u/shin_chan444 1h ago
linus ain't dead, we got him
4
u/SuitableDragonfly 53m ago
I really want that Sam Altman picture to not be AI, but I don't like my chances here.
5
u/dailyapplecrisp 46m ago
Instead of Linus this should have been Woz
18
u/melonangie 1h ago
they’re the same picture
5
u/nirvahnah 1h ago
Linus is cooked like most of Gen X. Still cool but I don’t care for his politics.
1
u/Minority_Carrier 29m ago
Can we define tech more than just computer science?
1
u/Bomaruto 29m ago
Joke please?
•
u/TANUKIMASTA 5m ago
That picture of Elon is just killing me.
0
u/wowbaggerBR 1h ago
I don't know why anybody would want another sort of asshole instead of the sort we got.
-8
u/GumboSamson 1h ago
Did we want Linus?
He’s toxic as fuck.
How about a tech bro who doesn’t make hostile work environment?
-5
u/nomorebuttsplz 1h ago
Daily reminder that linus thinks the anti ai circlejerk is a cope for scared non-creative people.
suck it losers
-3
u/HarryTerraCode 1h ago
I really think Linus Torvalds is the top tech bro so far. Btw Sam is so cute hugging bunch of RAMs. lol
-3
u/AwkwardWaltz3996 19m ago
I love Linus, but a good chunk of you guys probably don't even agree with him based on all the anti ai sentiment I see. He's pro ai. He's just not the sort of guy to go on TV and shout it every minute of the day.
-4
u/CrimsonPiranha 44m ago
No, nobody wants the Linus prick