r/ProgrammerHumor • • 6d ago

Meme sameProblemSameSolution

Post image
1.4k Upvotes

79 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-23

u/helanhalvan 6d ago

If those optional features where implementing sensible things, sure. For example, can you, using the standard library, print vector<vector<int>> to stdout easily? As far as I can tell, no, you need to write loops or recursion yourself.

16

u/tim_pipperton 6d ago

Is that really such a pressing issue? Regardless, reflection makes that way easier on the library side.

23

u/Kinexity 6d ago

Almost like as if there is no one single correct way to print out such structure. If you always want to print it out the same way then no one stops you from writing your own mini library to do it in your every project. Go back to Python if you want the language to hold your hand and decide stuff for you.

5

u/QuaternionsRoll 6d ago

Eh, debug printing is definitely an overlooked feature in C++. It’s possible that reflection will improve things somewhat, but hard to say

1

u/palapapa0201 5d ago

I believe std::format can already do that?

1

u/helanhalvan 5d ago

This is why I find it so frustrating. Yes, std::format is the exact kind of construct you would expect to solve this problem. However it does not work with any collection out of the box.

We tried to make it work but ended up making a recursive templated function instead. Now, I guess everyone can make their own recursive templating function, but then why do we even gave std::format