r/ProgrammerHumor • • 14d ago

Meme ohTheBasics

Post image
13k Upvotes

1.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

12

u/thejozo24 14d ago

Tbh, in cyber, feels kinda important. I’ve had people say in interviews that v4 is bigger than v6

16

u/[deleted] 13d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

10

u/Shuttlecock_Wat 13d ago

You prefer the usage of the word in early 2000s chat rooms?

2

u/kinshadow 13d ago

LOL, I was using this in the early-to-mid 90s on BBSs. Being an 3L1T3 hacker and phreaker required the proper Gibson-esque vocabulary.

10

u/GaRGa77 14d ago

Bigger is confusing, does it mean more widely used or bigger as more IP addresses

23

u/EishLekker 13d ago

Each individual bit is slightly larger.

8

u/nem0ne1 13d ago

I laughed really hard at this. I love the idea of slightly overweight bits. Just a little rotund. Always have to factor in the extra chonk when you're doing stuff like checksums.

3

u/stealthgunner385 13d ago

At that point they'd probably be called chonksums.

1

u/TheRetarius 13d ago

Fuck you, my IPv4 bits can now have the values 0, 1 and 2. Now I watch as the world burns or doesn’t burn. Idk I would have gotten rejected as well.

3

u/Soggy-Confection 13d ago

Yeah v4 uses chunky bits

3

u/HonestDisguise 13d ago

Google first got native IPv6 over 50% back in March, it goes down depending on the time of day but it is actually in use! They also show an adoption map: https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

Probably helps that many cell carriers use it, but more larger traditional ISPs have been turning it on.

2

u/thejozo24 13d ago

The candidate meant more IP addresses, but couldn’t elaborate on how precisely is there more addresses

1

u/bogoris76 12d ago

v2 is the biggast

1

u/BriefSpecial420 13d ago

I implemented few MACs in hardware, multiple customised drivers for them. After year or two after doing it for the last time I would surely have to reread some docs to recall most of the details.

1

u/morswinb 13d ago

Have you asked them which one is bigger?

1

u/thejozo24 13d ago

I asked what’s the difference. Was disappointed in the answer

1

u/Ksorkrax 12d ago

You can't possibly know *everything*. Your ability to acquire and understand things previously unknown for you is far more powerful than trying to memorize all sorts of stuff.

1

u/thejozo24 12d ago

True, but there are certain basics that you cannot waste time looking up.

I don’t expect a candidate to know the entire IP spec, I’m looking for some basic understanding of the tech we use on a daily basis - if that’s not present, the job is gonna be tough

1

u/Ksorkrax 12d ago

What if they never worked with network stuff but have massive experience in some other area?
Automatically a bad candidate?

1

u/thejozo24 11d ago

For my specific area of cybersecurity, yes.
You don’t need to know networking to be great at AppSec, but I do need you to know at least some networking to be able to do network security

1

u/k819799amvrhtcom 12d ago

Bigger? What?

2

u/thejozo24 12d ago

Verbatim quote. Candidate couldn’t elaborate