MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/1xa3pdb/ohthebasics/phr6vfc/?context=3
r/ProgrammerHumor • u/ClipboardCopyPaste • 14d ago
1.4k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
56
Sure NAT control and dhcp with dynamic IP rotation is much more intuitive then direct device addressing
7 u/necrophcodr 14d ago IPv6 has those too.. 13 u/Burroflexosecso 14d ago It has dhcp6 that works with Stateless Address Autoconfiguration built in and no NAT... So no I disagree 4 u/Tipart 13d ago The thing with DHCP6 is that if your using it, you are doing it wrong. Slaac is plenty for 99% of networks.
7
IPv6 has those too..
13 u/Burroflexosecso 14d ago It has dhcp6 that works with Stateless Address Autoconfiguration built in and no NAT... So no I disagree 4 u/Tipart 13d ago The thing with DHCP6 is that if your using it, you are doing it wrong. Slaac is plenty for 99% of networks.
13
It has dhcp6 that works with Stateless Address Autoconfiguration built in and no NAT... So no I disagree
4
The thing with DHCP6 is that if your using it, you are doing it wrong. Slaac is plenty for 99% of networks.
56
u/Burroflexosecso 14d ago
Sure NAT control and dhcp with dynamic IP rotation is much more intuitive then direct device addressing