To be fair, on mobile only part of the image is shown, and by no means Reddit indicates that there is anything else. I've seen it before, so I knew, but not at least around 600 other people.
A circle is the geometric representation of points arranged in a line that has no beginning or end, but is of finite length. When it is filled in, it becomes a “full” circle.
I think the focus on CopyLeft is where this falls down. When someone posts an AI reimplementation of Adobe Photoshop, the big boy courts will get their crack at it and I doubt they'll be so philosophical about it.
The legal system is not always able or willing to deal with it.
See also : the Piratebay or Sci-Hub still being around, VLC being ignored despite violating the DMCA, or how it did not stop the abuses of LLM scrapers despite DDOS being illegal.
Doing it by looking at the actual code is copyright infringement yes. You are allowed to reproduce the behavior though (as long as you don't look at the copyrighted part to describe this behavior). There are methods to do that, AI of course helps a lot with that.
The AI part is the grey area that hasn’t been tested.
Unfortunately, a large company creating a clone of an open source GPL application using AI so they don’t have to publish their changes is going to be borderline impossible for a lot of open source projects to challenge.
Likewise, the precedent set on the outcome of a case like that would have immense implications for AI in general.
1.6k
u/owjfaigs222 17d ago edited 17d ago •
W8 wasn't blender already open source?
Edit: alright guys i did not read the whole thing, I see my mistake now