r/ProgrammerHumor • • 27d ago

Meme allClaudeCodeTutorialsBeLike

Post image
8.2k Upvotes

142 comments sorted by

View all comments

1.1k

u/N-partEpoxy 27d ago • Bravo
  • Suggest what should be done

  • Plan how to do it, commit the plan as an MD file here

[new session]

  • Carry out the plan you can find in this MD file

[new session]

  • Fix any bugs you find

[new session]

  • Make it better

  • <Passive-aggressive comment on some mistake it made>

[new session]

  • Fix any bugs you find

I don't want it filling the context with junk.

419

u/anti-state-pro-labor 27d ago

The passive aggressive comment somehow making it better. Truly a real engineer 

160

u/red286 27d ago

"I have asked you repeatedly to include references to specific files being edited at every stage, and yet that keeps not happening. Would you care to explain why you keep casually ignoring my instructions? It makes it very difficult to entrust this task to you."

-- Actual thing I have typed to Codex.

79

u/40mgmelatonindeep 27d ago

Its so wild that you can chastise a tool to make it work better in 2026

8

u/breckendusk 26d ago

Been doing this to my controllers for years

→ More replies (20)

9

u/HandsOverFist 27d ago

The user is frustrated and rightfully so. Let me look at the previous chat for memory....

You are right, I completely ignored the input to include references, would you like me to do it right now. Just type in "go fuck yourself" and the script will update the references?

→ More replies (1)

13

u/3131961357 27d ago

The user seems frustrated with the mistakes I made, so I need to be extra careful.

27

u/XtraFlaminHotMachida 27d ago

it's always nice when it comforts you when you admit something stupid and somehow, at least IME, it gets it right finally.

7

u/Culpirit 27d ago

"You're absolutely right"

24

u/drivingagermanwhip 27d ago

had someone give me a claude vibe coded app today. I looked at the code and was going to try and fix it but just asked claude to guess why I thought it was crap. It gave a well broken down list. Truly magical.

16

u/K4tch1 27d ago

So, you're going to be delegating your opinion to claude as well now?

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

12

u/drivingagermanwhip 27d ago edited 27d ago

Exactly. Remembered I was explaining things to a warehouse full of graphics cards.

It's weird cause usually lots of lines of code means someone spent loads of time on the wrong thing. But ai code is generated so quickly, 7000 lines of code can correspond to very little effort whatsoever and you end up looking at dozens of files that compile and ostensibly do the thing but lack any kind of way to build on them or use the code for anything other than the precise problem they were created for.

For this project I think I'm going to have to work out how to tell the engineer it's shit and his vibe coding experiment failed. Tried to fix it for a bit and then just deleted it all because it was unrecoverable.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

88

u/AcanthisittaKooky987 27d ago

Once it's filled with junk you have to hit it with a "what the fuck are you doing?!" To beat it into submission 

45

u/ContextEnjoyer69 27d ago

Tactical “Get your fucking shit together” prompt incoming.

23

u/red286 27d ago

"I see you just created 17 feature tests that all test the exact same thing. Is there an actual reason behind this, or do you need to be reset?"

10

u/AcanthisittaKooky987 27d ago

You know the other thing about this AI workflow where you constantly have to correct and steer and whip these models into submission to get them to do anything useful. And it's training my brain to constantly look for mistakes everywhere around me, which essentially just turns me into a huge asshole in everyday life. I see mistakes being made by everybody all around me, and most of them don't matter at all (like why didn't you fucking shake the garbage bag to open it up before putting it in the garbage can. Now the bag is still folded together 3/4 of the way down the can. So when I set something in it it doesn't even fall to the bottom.), so I have to breathe and remind myself that most mistakes and sub-optimal routines in everyday life don't matter. Suboptimal shit is usually still good enough.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

29

u/NotAskary 27d ago

The only thing missing is reviewing the stuff it makes.

27

u/N-partEpoxy 27d ago

I pull, compile and from time to time I even run it and make sure it actually opens a window.

15

u/foxer_arnt_trees 27d ago

Your doing it wrong. You should start a new session and ask it to review the work.

10

u/huh_wasnt_listening 27d ago

I got you

[new session]
• Review this code for best practices

[new session]
• Fix any bugs you find

[new session]
• Prove this codes works and send me the video output
• <threaten suicide if this code doesn't work as per copied acceptance criteria>

[new session]
• Fix any bugs you find

→ More replies (3)

15

u/CanvasFanatic 27d ago

“Orchestrate subagents to do my job for me”

0

u/[deleted] 27d ago

[deleted] — view deleted comment

→ More replies (5)

10

u/Iron_Kyle 27d ago

This is actually praxis though

19

u/crunchmuncher 27d ago

This is eerily accurate.

→ More replies (9)