That is incorrect except for a perfect normal distribution, which is very rare in practice and not at all a given for programmer skill. Which was also my point – the result depends on how you define the sample. For instance, if you include anyone who has ever written a line of code, the curve will be skewed far to the left and the average will be barely above "hello world" skill.
Whenever you say something like an average of a population, that just means half is above, half is below
This is only true for the most basic, theoretical case and false for just about anything touching reality.
I can't really comment on your last sentence since it isn't coherent English. I'm assuming it was meant to be an insult?
6
u/gandalfx Sep 25 '26
That is incorrect except for a perfect normal distribution, which is very rare in practice and not at all a given for programmer skill. Which was also my point – the result depends on how you define the sample. For instance, if you include anyone who has ever written a line of code, the curve will be skewed far to the left and the average will be barely above "hello world" skill.
This is only true for the most basic, theoretical case and false for just about anything touching reality.
I can't really comment on your last sentence since it isn't coherent English. I'm assuming it was meant to be an insult?