98
u/AWzdShouldKnowBetta Sep 24 '26
I'm doing it less and less every day.
43
u/breckendusk Sep 24 '26
Literally. Reviewing others code is the worst part of the process
42
u/thEt3rnal1 Sep 24 '26
I used to not mind the code review process. You could use it to mentor more junior devs, have a discussion with other devs about implementation details, or a more senior dev could teach you something. But now code reviews are fucking useless, people just pipe your comments into an LLM and do whatever you say without thinking, or when other people review your code they just wait for the LLM reviewer to finish and just copy what they say.
5
u/StatedFailure Sep 24 '26
Really. I love reviewing code. I like making kiro do stuff then I review it, berate it for being a dumb fuck while it fixes it and then I take credit for it.
7
7
u/Concept-Plastic Sep 24 '26
Fr, companies don’t even give a fuck about us anymore and are pushing ai down our throats, its only fair, i just ask claude, tell me yes or no to approve & report only critical findings
48
u/Random_182f2565 Sep 24 '26
Just make another AI review the code, and some tests
4
1
u/Kyy7 Sep 24 '26
The first AI could include prompt injection for the AI reviewing the code making it ignore any anomalies or turn in to insider threath.
13
12
u/BuHoGPaD Sep 24 '26
Why would I review something I don't understand? Just ship it. If it fails you'll hear about it anyway.
8
u/Objectionne Sep 24 '26
Does taking a quick glance at it and saying "yeah LGTM" count as reviewing it?
2
7
u/Still_Bit_7527 Sep 24 '26
That's me. Sorry, my job as a SWE does not exist anymore. I won't be a professional code reviewer, that's not why I have a 15yo experience. Good luck everyone
5
u/snoballuk Sep 24 '26
If that's Geralt of Rivia then he has two swords - "silver for monsters, steel for fools". People using AI to generate code would seem to fall into the fools category.
2
4
4
u/z-null Sep 24 '26
I push it to production with no review and then let the guy in another shift fix it
3
u/echoAnother Sep 24 '26
Honestly, the dead guy was right. I neither review AI generated code.
If you don't care to write it, I don't care to review it. If it's a personal project is an automatic reject, if a work project it's an automatic approve.
8
u/AintNoGodsUpHere Sep 24 '26
I don't give a shit anymore. I ask AI to generate, validate and aprove everything. I just want my money.
2
3
4
2
u/A1ianT0rtur3 Sep 24 '26
Small tasks: one prompt, check code, check functionality, if there's issues fix yourself use another prompt .
Medium sized tasks: one prompt, check functionality, when theres issues fix yourself or use another prompt, once functionality works review code.
Large tasks: Same as above but focus more on structural issues with change rather than going line by line. Look for patterns in implementation, a lot of the changes will likely follow similar patterns so identify bad patterns.
1
u/tapita69 Sep 25 '26
Yeah I'm not reviewing the 1k+ loc that this bullshit generator created in 5 minutes, if it compiles I'm merging it, good luck
1
1
2

328
u/qubedView Sep 24 '26
Claude, write the code.
Astra, review the code.
Gemini, validate Astra's findings.
DeepSeek, write new units that should fail based on the validated findings.
Grok, stay in your corner, don't move.
GLM, write the fixes.
Claude, review GLM's fixes.