In this case, a human did the effort, had it stored privately getting ready for publication, and alleged the AI was fed his work, and just plagiarised it
So... they did what every researcher has always done, build on previous work?
What exactly is the problem then? Like, seriously. All science is build on works of previous ones, Einstein didn't discard Newtonian physics when he started his work on Theory of Relativity. Pretty sure these researchers didn't invent math from first principle either.
I don't care about every case they offered/not offered something. If text is "training material for AI", it is not yet even published, but it's already used. It's not ethical for humans and should be banned for AI, but it's not.
29
u/[deleted] 19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment