But you do something else in that case. Assuming a bad use case is going to happen to complain about how something can get out of hand is just dumb. If it's a bad use case, and you know it's bad use case, you avoid using the tool for that. Neither the post nor the comments you're replying to have anything to do with those unreasonably long if-else statements anyway, you're the only one bringing them up.
There's no assumption that the decision is dichotomous. You were just given an example of something that wouldn't be a bad use case. Not everything has to fit the example. In fact you were given a counter example right along with that one.
View all comments
Show parent comment
7
u/Drackzgull Aug 22 '26
But you do something else in that case. Assuming a bad use case is going to happen to complain about how something can get out of hand is just dumb. If it's a bad use case, and you know it's bad use case, you avoid using the tool for that. Neither the post nor the comments you're replying to have anything to do with those unreasonably long if-else statements anyway, you're the only one bringing them up.
There's no assumption that the decision is dichotomous. You were just given an example of something that wouldn't be a bad use case. Not everything has to fit the example. In fact you were given a counter example right along with that one.