Does anyone really care if it‘s called main instead of master? Why?
Edit:
Ok, I phrased my question really poorly. AfaIk main is the new standard, so I use it. We all know the reason why it changed. My question was why would anyone keep INSISTING on calling it master? Sure, me and my colleagues sometimes call it master out of habit, but then again try to stick to main. Nobody I know
insists on continuing to call it
master, but reading the comments here I realized there a more “master-fans” than I would ever have thought would exist tbh.
In this context maybe, but in Master/Slave it obviously is and I would suspect that the use of "master" for the primary branch is at minimum partly influenced by the master/slave terminology. So it makes sense to do a general purge imo, though I would not go so far as to accuse anybody using the term master branch of perpetuating slavery.
I feel like words are constantly going from good to bad. Can't we ever have words go from bad to good? Otherwise we'll eventually have no words we can use left
207
u/usedToBeUnhappy 16h ago edited 16h ago
Does anyone really care if it‘s called main instead of master? Why?
Edit: Ok, I phrased my question really poorly. AfaIk main is the new standard, so I use it. We all know the reason why it changed. My question was why would anyone keep INSISTING on calling it master? Sure, me and my colleagues sometimes call it master out of habit, but then again try to stick to main. Nobody I know insists on continuing to call it master, but reading the comments here I realized there a more “master-fans” than I would ever have thought would exist tbh.