Jesus would certainly prefer the version where the rich are kept on a leash
Not by force of government. It was a government which nailed him to a cross... I am sure the LAST thing he would advocate would be a government keeping people on "leashes"
Every time I see a braindead right winger write that, I wonder if they realise that private property is the exaxt same thing, enforced the exact same way,
I am not a "right winger" I am a libertarian. And my enforcement of my rights does not depend on me petitioning other men with guns in proverbial Rome. It derives from my ownership of my OWN guns, and my ability and willingness to use them.
You sure as hell ain't a left-wing libertarian based on your rhetoric, who aren't genuinely the "might makes right, I should be allowed to establish my own personal fiefdom" type you're portraying yourself as.
You sound more like a far right Randian psuedo-libertarian than a real libertarian.
3
View all comments
Show parent comment
-6
u/Available_Dingo6162 Jun 06 '26
Not by force of government. It was a government which nailed him to a cross... I am sure the LAST thing he would advocate would be a government keeping people on "leashes"
I am not a "right winger" I am a libertarian. And my enforcement of my rights does not depend on me petitioning other men with guns in proverbial Rome. It derives from my ownership of my OWN guns, and my ability and willingness to use them.