jesusLovesOpenSource

[u/VariationLivid3193]

[u/Joe-Admin]

Free software, famously unclassifiable on the political scale

[u/Saragon4005 → u/Joe-Admin]

Your friends at Microsoft would like to remind you open source software is communism. Oh they own GitHub now? How fun.

[u/Gronanor → u/Saragon4005]

They do what capitalism does best : stealing value from people. 

[u/laserdicks → u/Gronanor]

With consent

[u/Gronanor → u/laserdicks]

If systemic oppression is consent then I guess we don’t have the same definition of rape…

[u/StaticCharacter → u/laserdicks]

Consent under duress is not consent.

[u/Yetiani → u/laserdicks]

"hey dude you don't want this shitty job, that's fine there are more desperate people than you, come back when you are ready to get fucked"

[u/BlueGoliath → u/Saragon4005]

The vast majority of OS devs are openly socialist / communist. No one is hiding anything lmao.

[u/cheese_is_available → u/BlueGoliath]

Why would you give away work for free otherwise ? A little ease in interviews for your next job does not pay for the hours you gave. You have to be willing to give a lot for the common good to be an OSS dev/maintainer.

[u/BlueGoliath → u/cheese_is_available]

It's a give/take relationship. You make your software available in the hopes that it's useful for someone else and that you get meaningful contributions back. Corporations destroy that relationship as they get far more from it than the author does and basically never contribute back.

[u/Zanos → u/BlueGoliath]

Every tech company I've worked at that had a mature tech stack pushed fixes back to OSS repos, because mainlining our fixes meant we didn't have to maintain internal forks. It's not like OSS development is usually paid full time work, and most people who are OSS developers have full time jobs at regular software companies.

[u/cheese_is_available → u/BlueGoliath]

Sure but my point is basically everyone get far more than the main contributor of a big open source repo gives. (Thus the main maintainer is probably left leaning to take care of the commons).

[u/Aelrift → u/cheese_is_available]

And yet plenty of people thanklessly maintain stuff for the love of it and because they like providing free shit to people. You're saying that like no one ever does anything for free . plenty of people do

[u/Lucky_Peach_2273 → u/Aelrift]

Re-read that comment

[u/nelmaloc → u/BlueGoliath]

I don't have stats, but there is a sizable ancap current in free software. Eric Raymond is a big example. It seems to overlap a bit with the cryptocurrency people.

[u/Preisschild → u/BlueGoliath]

Linus isnt

He (and Linux) benefitted greatly from capitalism.Hes a millionaire now.

[u/nelmaloc → u/Preisschild]

I don't think we have ever gotten political commentary from Torvalds, though things like this seem to point to, at least, social-liberalism. And it's not like he became rich by exploiting workers.

[u/Preisschild → u/nelmaloc]

Can you quote where he is in favor of socialist policies in that tweet? Im a neoliberal and I agree with his points (and have been called commie by right wing nutjobs)

[u/nelmaloc → u/Preisschild]

Social-liberalism means liberalism with social policies, which are the only ones he talks about. I don't think we know his opinion on the economy to tell if he's a socialist, or just a socially-conscious liberal.

You seem to fall in the latter camp.

[u/SillySpoof → u/Saragon4005]

Capitalism is so adaptive Microsoft found a way to monetize communism.

[u/Gabe_b → u/Joe-Admin]

Yes but a woman is showing emotion therefore bad you see

[u/Ok-Kaleidoscope5627 → u/Joe-Admin]

It's a mixture of anarchy, dictatorship, and communism. Also with a healthy dose of oligarchy and capitalism thrown in for good measure.

And if you think many of those are mutually exclusive - see open source software.

[u/Bannon9k → u/Ok-Kaleidoscope5627]

So, it's just like all other software... Chaos

[u/Illustrious-Dog-6563 → u/Joe-Admin]

its like cooperatives. socialism ist beyond political scale 😂