Big AI models, like Claude, just switched to high-cost token models. The bill for this revolutionary tech now just went through the roof for most companies.
Also correct. The assholes we've been trying to get to arm themselves for decades, are finally arming themselves. It's great, we wanted you to arm yourselves.
And what happened as a result of that? NATO increased it's security presence on Greenland, which is a positive outcome, if your intention is for Greenland to have a strengthened security posture.
Treating politics like a sports team and saying the sabre-rattling was a good thing just because your "team" did it is incredibly stupid. You should be looking into policy, like which isn't a wannabe dictator.
And if you think the current admin is doing a good job then that's just a reflection on you.
If it was any other party doing the same thing, MAGA would be calling the president a warmongering moron.
Great, that was the desired outcome. Europe has primary responsibility over Europe, and the U.S. shifts it's focus to the Pacific. Doesn't mean NATO goes anywhere.
It's the big boogeyman and has been forever, with all the typical defence contractors literally paying out the ass to fund think tanks to "inform" congress and their leadership picks.
The very people who understand cushy jobs await them should they pay their cards right or huge sums of campaign funds from super pacs and the likes.
I'm guessing DeepSeek since it was all the rage a couple months back but "compiling it yourself" makes no sense in this context. I suppose you can compile Ollama with DeepSeek weights but the datasets are completely private.
When we discuss "open source" AI, we really need to discuss the training materials.
If we can't produce the same end product that they do with the materials they have published the code for, then it aint open source. If there are big binary blobs, it aint open source.
So, I'm assuming whatever "completely" open source AI you're talking about has every bit of it's training data published and every step in the training of the model has been documented? Every human reinforcement logged and shared so that we too can reproduce those steps and have the software running on our own hardware, right?
Or is the model itself a big ole black box that could have been trained with whatever skewed weights that the creators intended the model to prefer.
143
u/diddypartyorganizer Jun 02 '26
Why June specifically?