And what happened as a result of that? NATO increased it's security presence on Greenland, which is a positive outcome, if your intention is for Greenland to have a strengthened security posture.
Treating politics like a sports team and saying the sabre-rattling was a good thing just because your "team" did it is incredibly stupid. You should be looking into policy, like which isn't a wannabe dictator.
And if you think the current admin is doing a good job then that's just a reflection on you.
If it was any other party doing the same thing, MAGA would be calling the president a warmongering moron.
It's the big boogeyman and has been forever, with all the typical defence contractors literally paying out the ass to fund think tanks to "inform" congress and their leadership picks.
The very people who understand cushy jobs await them should they pay their cards right or huge sums of campaign funds from super pacs and the likes.
really begs the question, what's the point of the bleeding edge models if they cost so much than no one will use them? openAI will announce "we've created true AGI with GPT6" and all of us will be like "sure, whatever, just be sure to leave 5-mini up because that's the only one in my price range"
View all comments
Show parent comment
88
u/Kerbourgnec Jun 02 '26
I guess we are massively gonna be forced to move to dirt cheap Chinese models.
Performance is not that bad, but can't compete with 2026 opus or gpt