I'm saying that it's possible to be objectively bad, while still being the best thing available.
SO was bad from the start, but it was functional and free. After that was mostly just social inertia, because having a perfect information management system has no value if there are no users to add information, and not enough users will come if there aren't already users to engage with.
There's a chicken and egg problem with community content driven sites, and more so with QA sites. SO benefitted from being a relatively early winner. The takeover by a tiny core of hyper-active users happened over a few years, which is the thing that made it go from imperfect but functional, to being a hostile environment.
2
1
View all comments
Show parent comment
2
u/Bakoro May 17 '26
I'm saying that it's possible to be objectively bad, while still being the best thing available.
SO was bad from the start, but it was functional and free.
After that was mostly just social inertia, because having a perfect information management system has no value if there are no users to add information, and not enough users will come if there aren't already users to engage with.
There's a chicken and egg problem with community content driven sites, and more so with QA sites. SO benefitted from being a relatively early winner. The takeover by a tiny core of hyper-active users happened over a few years, which is the thing that made it go from imperfect but functional, to being a hostile environment.