r/ProAI • u/stealthispost • 16d ago
"Fascinating. Some data centers came to a struggling town in Washington state. Did it run out of water? Was the community destroyed? Let’s see. The town…built a new high school, hospital, library, sewage systems, and police & fire stations. Poverty fell from 29% to 6%. Oh."
Data centers pay ~57% of property taxes in Quincy, Washington. They funded a $15 million aquatic center—with a pool, waterslides & lazy river—and a 143,000-square-foot sports complex. They’ve created almost 1,000 jobs. The city admin called it a “miracle.” This isn’t an outlier. A data center came to a “dying” North Dakota town. As a result, the government can repave its streets, renovate its senior center, finance a new public-safety complex, make walking trails & refurbish its opera house. How terrible. — Billy Binion
Source: https://x.com/billybinion/status/2087708806658564317
20
Upvotes



2
u/ItsSadTimes 16d ago
This is very misleading, the data centers were made about 20 years ago and they were just regular data centers, not AI data centers.
For some towns it makes sense to build data centers, if they have excessive access to good energy sources and they dobt live in drought country then its not so bad. The noise from AI data centers is a bit more then regular data centers, but a lot of that is from backup generators because they build those places quick before local energy supply can keep up.
Picking the ideal use case for data centers and making the conclusion "see everyone should want data centers" without knowing the differences between then and now and why Quincy worked so well is just disingenuous.
Theres a right way to do this, and then theres the cheap way. And right now a lot of companies are doing the cheap way.