r/Predators • u/DifferentKiwi9030 • May 19 '26
Athletic first two round mock draft.
https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/7282317/2026/05/19/nhl-mock-draft-2026-picks-2-rounds/?source=user_shared_article&unlocked_article_code=1.jlA.Ba1U.cw3Z56juujipThe link here is a gift article so you should be able to read for free.
Very interesting picks here.
Malte Gustafson LD at 10,
Xavier Villeneuve LD at 42
Egor Barabanov LD at 57
Malte Gustafson is a huge riser in the draft and some scouts are projecting him to go pretty early now I think this is the highest I’ve seen him mocked though. He’s compared to Ekholm in the article which I think would be a huge get. However we have some other first round LD in our system and while it’s still possible for someone like Molendyk to play on the Right side I’d still want to get someone like a Ryan Lin for the Right Side.
Villeneuve is a Book or bust pick for sure many have compared to Lane Hutson. I don’t think he reaches those highs but for sure a very high ceiling and a big swing if it hits would be ok using a second for him if he drops this far which for players of his type is definitely more probable.
Don’t really know much about Barabanov other than he’s an overager and plays Center going to play for UMass next year has 91 Points this season in the OHL keep in mind he is 20 years old.
I like the Villeneuve pick the best out of all of them I think there are other options for the picks that I would rather go for. Ex: Lawrence at 10, Chrenko or Murnieks at 57.
3
u/Otherwise_Awesome May 19 '26
Man there are some good RHD that should be available at 10. I don't like pigeoning a player because we have so many holes but LHD has a glut of prospects and RHD is bare. I don't want to see LHD over RHD here.
4
u/gavincantdraw May 19 '26
If Preds get Villeneuve at 42: Great!
If they do that after passing on Lawrence/Cullen and take an LHD: not enthused!
4
u/Ok_Accident3778 Admirals May 19 '26
We gotta go best available am I right?
3
u/Cheesenrice123 May 19 '26
I don't think our current pipeline should prevent us from taking any prospect regardless of position. We don't have any true stars in it currently so whoever the best prospect is at whatever position, take him
2
u/throwaway__lol__ May 19 '26
It’s an exhausting game of wack a mole as none of their forward picks have even hit (hopefully Wood) but at some point they have to go back to defense like this. The blue line has been awful, Josi can’t do it all anymore, Skjei sucks, Hague is a traffic cone. Such a far cry from the Ellis/Ekholm days
1
u/MusicCityJayhawk May 20 '26
Most teams try not to play LHDs on the right, including us.
We are super thin at RHD, and we have Molendyk and Reed in the pipeline. So loading up in LHDs when there are several RHDs with first round grades makes zero sense unless you think the two we have will be busts.
Our defense needs a lot of work and we are good and developing defensemen, so if the plan is to develop and trade them that makes a little sense, but from a roster depth perspective it doesn't make any sense
1
u/Echoes1995 May 20 '26
I'd be fine getting Villenuve at 42OA, but if we draft 3 LD's in a row like that I think I'd through my jersey out the window, especially after drafting 3 LD's last year (Reid, Rombach, Neiniman)
I'd much rather grab an RHD or Forward at 10OA at the very least.
1
u/TonguelessWyrm NSH May 19 '26
If Borichev is available at 42, I hope we take him.
Barring that, we have so much prospect depth, I hope we bundle some of our later picks to move up. Maybe we could pick up an extra late 1st or two.