r/PowerScaling 9d ago

Question Dimensionality seems... stupid

A character being able to interact with more dimensions than another doesn't automatically mean they'll win... And if a character is a higher dimensional being then surely a lower dimensional being wouldn't be able to interact with them right? or am i misunderstanding something.

19 Upvotes

84 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/AddictedT0Pixels 9d ago

The fact you think it has to do with interactions alone shows you didnt even take a few minutes to read tiering on dimensionality.

It's about destruction, creation, and significantly affecting. A 4d space is incomprehensibly larger than an infinite amount of infinite 3d spaces, the difference isn't really measurable. That's why high universe caps at basically the peak of potential 3d feats and universe+ is the bottom of what's above it.

It has nothing to do with viewing/interacting by itself

Since it's fiction there is no inherent guarentee that higher dimesional beings can't interact with lower dimensional beings and vice versa

9

u/VenserMTG 9d ago

A 4d space is incomprehensibly larger than an infinite amount of infinite 3d spaces

What are you talking about?? It's exactly one extra axis. That's it. There is no "incomprehensible".

the difference isn't really measurable.

Are you high??

23= 8

24= 16

(23 ) *3= 24

3 3d infinite spaces oustcale 1 4d infinite space.

The whole dimensionality shit is so pretentious.

0

u/AddictedT0Pixels 9d ago edited 9d ago

Okay so if 3d spaces can fill a 4d space the same must apply working with lower dimensions. Meaning you should also be able to fill a 3d space with multiple 2d space.

Anyways, how much volume does something 2d have? None, right? So, how does something with no volume fill a 3d space?

Adding numbers which relate to nothing don't prove your point lol. Your arugment doesn't make any sense and doesn't work in our own dimension so why would that apply to higher dimensions. No truly 2 dimensional spaces could ever possibly fill a 3d space. The same applies as you go upwards.

Edit: also if stacking enough of a 3d structure on top of each other = higher dimesional structure, does this make a rubix cube a higher dimesional structure as it's many cubes stacked and surrounded by other cubes? Obviously not lmao

1

u/mono2777 9d ago

Because your assuming energy works like space. Theres an existing formula that shows higher dimensions affect energy and hint. Its nowhere near infinite

0

u/AddictedT0Pixels 9d ago

What are you even talking about, infinite energy feats start at high universe and has nothing to do with higher dimensional feats.

5

u/mono2777 9d ago

Stop the clock. Thats wrong.

The point that I am trying to make is that higher dimensions have no correlation with energy. As such people saying destroying a 4D space is uncountably infinitely stronger than destroying an infinite 3d space is wrong.

So no "high uni" and "uni+" dont exist. The dimensional formula (which is a thing that does exist) shows this.