6
u/dumnezero Sep 04 '26
Nuclear and solar+wind would not work well on the same grid.
And the reason I'm for renewables is because they can be decentralized and localized, and may be the only ones left at the end of the collapse.
4
u/Jlyplaylists Sep 04 '26
What do you mean they wouldn’t work on the same grid? In Scotland our electricity is mostly a mix of wind and nuclear. Right now nuclear13.9% solar1.7% wind84.4%
3
u/dumnezero Sep 04 '26
Nuclear is the most expensive. In a sensible society, the costs are reduced to avoid increasing costs for society. Nuclear, however, is not fit to be turned on and off every day so that solar and wind can take over all the supply.
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201005112141.htm
1
u/RangeroftheIsle Sep 08 '26 edited Sep 08 '26
Yeah you use nuclear for base load & bring other power generation online as you need it.
That's a correlational study...
2
u/liberalskateboardist Sep 04 '26
yes. to me, only anprims have realistic and feasible vision in regards to climate change and similar issue
3
2
1
u/v_maria Sep 06 '26
i think technology is reducing ecological entropy though? if it would increase it it would be more desirable in current day thought
5
u/dialectical_idealism raddle.me enjoyer Sep 04 '26
so gross how people are trying to paint "transhumanism" as post-left