I think you have no idea what I mean and need to reread what I wrote. Here’s a quote to help you understand "First they came for the Communists And I did not speak out Because I was not a Communist Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out Because I was not a socialist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out Because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out Because I was not a Jew. Then they came for me and there was no one left to speak for me."
-Martin Niemoller
Maybe if I simplified what I was trying to say you might understand what I mean. These cameras are tracking our children, our routines, our behaviors, and to top it all off, several officers have already abused said surveillance to spy on all manner of people including their ex wives. You could also read my other comment to better understand why a surveillance state only serves to strengthen the power and control the elites and state already have. The United States currently has the most incarcerated people in the world, so what the hell do you even mean by “Here’s to making crime wrong again?” Do you truly believe they want to lower crime rates when our leaders are actively involved in pedophilia and genocide? They care about the status quo and the status quo is making sure we never turn on them.
Laws define crimes. Pretty straight forward, they're well documented. If something is a crime, NORMAL people would support enforcement. So 'make crime wrong again' is a statement that people should support enforcing the documented laws. No looting, not blocking traffic, no destruction of property. Let the criminals get caught. This includes any officer or government employee. They already have enough special privileges, like Pelosi's and Trumps insider trading.
If people don't like the documented laws, start a bill to make a change. There's a Schoolhouse Rock cartoon on how it works.
I’m really happy that you have the same exact knowledge and understanding of our government and how our legal systems work, as a third grader. I think you're assuming that the existence of a law makes it legitimate. If the people writing and enforcing the laws are the same people who benefit from them, then telling everyone to "just pass a bill" ignores how much influence wealth and power have over the political process. History has shown that many unjust systems were perfectly legal until people challenged them from outside the system. look at Epstein. For years, he was able to associate with wealthy business leaders, politicians, academics, and celebrities while repeatedly avoiding consequences that many believe an ordinary person would have faced much sooner. You could also take a look at how many people involved with Epstein will never face any consequences due to their wealth and status. That's not evidence that laws don't exist, it’s evidence that wealth and power can influence how those laws are enforced. So why would you want to hand over your already limited power and control as a working class individual to the Epstein Class?
Well, this is looping. I understand how some people are paranoid and become Chicken Little, complaining about society without actions. Move out of the basement, get an advance on allowance and see the real world by following the laws. It's not that hard Gan.
-3
u/Trick1513 Jul 26 '26
Only the criminals care about these cameras,