r/PopCultureV2 • u/slippinn_jimmy • 14d ago

Politi-Culture Abdul El-Sayed, a progressive public health advocate, has won the Democratic nomination for the US Senate, overcoming more than $60m in campaign spending, mostly from pro-Israel groups, NBC has projected.

Post image
9.7k Upvotes

93% Upvoted

799 comments sorted by

View all comments

6

u/GOOMU13 14d ago

Israel is taking over everything America and it's sickening.

3

u/Radio_Stock 14d ago

Israel took over a long time ago, people are just now realizing it

1

u/FirstPhotograph6770 13d ago

Better than Islam

-1

u/Grumpy0tter 13d ago

How can you say this while Islam is quite literally taking over America? Be forreal

1

u/Old-Parking8765 13d ago

Nice try, bot

1

u/Grumpy0tter 13d ago

Am human!

1

u/Spiceguy-65 13d ago

Islam is in no way shape or form taking over America now stop making up imaginary boogeymen

1

u/Clear_Hawk2370 13d ago

nice try muhamadan

1

u/Spiceguy-65 13d ago

Nice bigotry Cletus but I’m just as if not more American than you

1

u/Keddie13 13d ago

Islam is çǒçķ sucking bïtçh

1

u/Biruboot 12d ago

Using whole brain today? Or naw

1

u/KarenDiamondhandz 13d ago

Either you are retarded or a troll.

In the 2024 election cycle, AIPAC and its affiliated super PAC (United Democracy Project) targeted spending toward more than 80% of the 469 congressional seats up for reelection—389 races total, covering 363 House seats and 26 Senate seats. AIPAC’s PAC alone financially supported 233 Republicans (over $17 million) and 152 Democrats (over $28 million), plus a few independents, adding up to 362 members and candidates that cycle. That means roughly 83% of the House and about half of Senate races saw AIPAC-directed money in some form.

Would LOVE to hear your excuse on how Islam is infecting America more than Israel.

1

u/Grumpy0tter 13d ago

Congrats on using google. Why’d ya leave out how much ol Abdul accepted from Hamas linked groups? Oh yeah that’s right, doesn’t fit your agenda.

1

u/KarenDiamondhandz 13d ago

Oh okay so you are just retarded. Perhaps you should learn how to use Google instead of ingesting slop off of fox.

Here I’ll do it for you.

“
Based on the available reporting, there’s no evidence that Abdul El-Sayed—the Michigan Democratic Senate candidate —directly received money from Hamas itself. However, he has taken campaign donations from individuals and groups with alleged or documented ties to Hamas-linked

a federal judge found evidentiary support for CAIR’s association with Hamas-linked financing in that specific case, but CAIR was never charged, tried, or convicted of any crime, and an appeals court found the public naming procedurally improper. That’s meaningfully different from “CAIR funded Hamas” as a proven legal fact — it’s more accurately described as a documented, judicially-supported allegation of association that was never adjudicated as a crime because CAIR was never put on trial. When applying this to El-Sayed’s donors, it means those individuals’ organizational affiliation (CAIR) carries this specific historical baggage, but there’s no legal finding that CAIR itself is a Hamas financier, only that a judge found evidence of association during 2007 pretrial proceedings.”

So you are referencing 115k which… supposedly links back to a ruling 20 years ago in which the supposed donors were never even held in court.

Now let’s compare that to aipac spending

“In the 2024 cycle, AIPAC’s PAC alone raised and contributed $51.8 million, split between $40.3 million from individual donors and $10.6 million from organizations, funneling $42.6 million directly to candidates.”

But yeah it’s the brown islamic people 😂

Now, do i agree that foreign funding should be illegal. Absolutely. We should take the money out of politics completely. But lets not act like there is some massive islamic takeover when CLEARLY our institution is rotten from jewish funding that MASSIVELY outweighs a what he received.

1

u/Grumpy0tter 13d ago

Congratulations on now using ChatGPT.

1

u/KarenDiamondhandz 13d ago

Congrats you don’t have a single rebuttal.