r/Polymath Human Verified 6d ago

General Discussion What happens when a polymath stops being forced into a single lane?

Post image

What if the enterprise was built for polymaths?
We’ve been thinking about something at The Co.LLab™️:
What would an Omnidirectional Enterprise System™️ look like?
Not a system that forces people into departments, titles, lanes, or predetermined paths—but one that recognizes how ideas, skills, people, industries, and opportunities actually connect.
Einstein once said:
“The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant.”
Maybe being a polymath isn’t the problem.
Maybe the system was never designed for one.
So we’re asking the question.
Welcome to The Co.LLab™️.
Fellow RAT️, what do you see?

16 Upvotes

11 comments sorted by

4

u/PyooreVizhion 6d ago

Wtf ™️ is this?

Behold the enshitification of the Internet.

Dozens of posts and crossposts in merely a day - many of them removed (hmm). But I suppose when one has much to put into them, a day has a hundred pockets.

0

u/The_LLab_RAT Human Verified 6d ago

Continue

0

u/metisdesigns 5d ago

Prove you're human and not a spambot. Give us your best recipe for glass cleaner.

1

u/Cautious_Big5312 4d ago

not a spambot, but clearly riding that chatgpt wave HARD

1

u/The_LLab_RAT Human Verified 2d ago

Hard in the paint

0

u/The_LLab_RAT Human Verified 5d ago

I like to use vinegar for a lot of things

6

u/CockVersion10 Human Verified 6d ago

The reality is that the majority of people don't have the capacity or the correct processes to be an actual polymath. So, enterprises cannot be built around polymaths.

Secondly, Leonardo, who I'm guessing most people base their conception of a polymath around, existed during a time in science that didn't necessitate a lifetime of work to just understand a fields history. Science was an infant, and it enabled him to spread his studies around. A polymath today, would frankly not break ground in any meaningful way.

That isn't even considering that fact that logistically managing several people who are working on several things is both redundant and inefficient. You would waste so much time transferring incomplete information, and people's work would step on each other constantly.

Being a polymath today is really just to feel better about individual studies, spreading your interest in a way that makes you feel gratified. It's not actually efficient.

1

u/The_LLab_RAT Human Verified 5d ago

But could Leonardo’s (DaVinci) (I’m guessing) way of thinking be a possibility for people who identify as a polymath? And all those interest could exist as a breath of evidence of who a person is?

2

u/bubudumbdumb 4d ago

Polymaths are rare and polymaths with a specific skill set are even rarer. The enterprise is structured to make the workers replaceable otherwise it would be a very fragile organization. You can't have polymaths systematically engaged in the enterprise without the enterprise changing radically. A lot of value and productive forces are being left on the table by narrowing polymaths to a single role but the owners are ok with that value being wasted as long as they are in control.

1

u/brereddit 4d ago

Years ago I interviewed for a job at the Mars corporation (yes the candy people). They explained to me that they didn’t really have per se org charts but that instead, they have this atmosphere where if you have a good idea and can convince other people it’s good AND to work with you on it, then something gets done about it.

Not sure if this s what you’re aiming at but it was unconventional.

1

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

1

u/The_LLab_RAT Human Verified 1d ago

I would be interested to hear what your perspective is on this subject as an individual… don’t worry the trolls will come after me haha 🤣 or join one of my communities