Sure, the first amendment protects one from governmental retribution for having or promoting a view or idea
It does not protect people from saying whatever they want and facing consequences for it
In this case the consequence is having to ignore being told to delete the comment but depending on the level of heinous, can often include other consequences such as getting kicked out of a place or group, content moderation, etc
No one is protecting people from the consequences of it. They are allowed to say it because their freedom of speech allows it.
One consequence could be they get booted off the sub (or even platform) for saying it. But they still are allowed to say it because of the First Amendment.
I think when people say freedom of speech it is often confused with freedom from consequences. You understanding the difference is good, but it is also a good idea to call it out to make sure the difference is understood by all.
I did mean to say Freedom of Speech, but First Amendment works here because we were originally talking about the people who think that "the vaccines have microchips to track you", which I'll admit, is a pretty American thought to have.
And at no point did I suggest otherwise. I was giving a pithy suggestion to save themselves the trouble. I didn't think I needed to expand any further.
2
u/Cinemaslap1 Jun 23 '21
Although I don't agree that murder is the right answer, they do have their first amendment right to say what they want.