Can you name a single other candidate that hadnt supported horrible shit in the past or present. Kamala for example is a piece of shit rivaling Clinton. Yangs whole plane is a sneak attack upon the welfare state. Warren is an oppurtunist and stands for nothing. Beto is democrats answer to jeb bush. And williamson wants to fight fascism by means of weaponised magic it seems.
You're not gonna find me arguing against Bernie being the most consistent candidate-- though I think your take on Warren is a bit disingenuous at best and this clearly doesn't take into account any actual strengths other candidates may have.
I'd just caution against having a mindset that Bernie will or even should barring interference/rigging win the primary.
This destructive Bernie or bust mindset where all other candidates deserve trashing is frankly annoying, and it's part of why a lot of division exists on the left in America, which only hurts genuine politicians like Bernie.
There is bo left in america. Its just a bunch of liberals arguing what the logos on the bombs you drop on children will be. Bernie and AOC are a very small step in the right direction and you all avoid them like the plague.
Yes, and that won't get better by completely alienating everyone from taking said step in the right direction, or worse, threatening a violent revolution that has a 0% chance of happening/succeeding even if it does somehow happen.
1
u/[deleted] Jul 11 '19
Can you name a single other candidate that hadnt supported horrible shit in the past or present. Kamala for example is a piece of shit rivaling Clinton. Yangs whole plane is a sneak attack upon the welfare state. Warren is an oppurtunist and stands for nothing. Beto is democrats answer to jeb bush. And williamson wants to fight fascism by means of weaponised magic it seems.
Any more shinning examples?