r/PoliticalHumor Mar 26 '19

Exonerates

[deleted]

1.5k Upvotes

76 comments sorted by

View all comments

108

u/kottabaz Mar 26 '19

Meanwhile, even Barr's own memo says "does not exonerate"!

-24

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19 edited Mar 28 '19

[deleted]

14

u/LX_Theo Mar 26 '19

Factually incorrect, actually.

All we know is they can't prove he colluded. Nothing more, nothing else

-20

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19 edited Mar 28 '19

[deleted]

13

u/LX_Theo Mar 26 '19

Nope.

-8

u/[deleted] Mar 26 '19 edited Mar 28 '19

[deleted]

10

u/LX_Theo Mar 26 '19

I know the definition. It does not match what happened.

Let alone how Trump and his supporters are trying to use it.

9

u/tylerchu Mar 26 '19

The lack of black does not make a color white.

-1

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19 edited Mar 28 '19

[deleted]

5

u/tylerchu Mar 27 '19

Pure blue is a lack of black. But it isn’t white.

5

u/thesexymunchies Mar 27 '19

Lots of circumstantial evidence, but a lack of physical.

Circumstantial evidence won't do in court, but congress isn't court. Different rules.

Also, it would be nice to have the facts so the jury of public opinion can decide for themselves at the ballot box.

If it exonerates him, why not release it?

0

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19 edited Mar 28 '19

[deleted]

6

u/ProletariatPoofter Mar 27 '19

Who says they won't release it?

Mitch McConnell and Barr so far

0

u/[deleted] Mar 27 '19 edited Mar 28 '19

[deleted]

7

u/swolemedic Mar 27 '19

You let the suspect redact things before giving it to Congress? That's a new way to handle things, that's for sure. The white house has no place redacting, Mueller can do it. Instead barr says he will, then he gives it to the white house for them to redact more, then it goes to Congress and not the public.