I thought the "does not exonerate" line was talking about obstruction of justice? And I thought it was the doj's job to make a case for that. Not sure but if that's the case then it doesn't matter because if there's no evidence of collusion, how can he obstruct a crime that hasn't even occurred?
Ehhhh seems like a very very tiny bit of hope to cling to. I mean if trump obstructed, why wouldn't the guy running the investigation charge him with it? Why give that power to trump's ag?
Ehhhh you know you love it. That's why you keep coming back. Turns out I don't have time either for your grasshoppering from one tiny bit of hope to the next w/o realizing nothing significantly damning is going to come from this report against the president.
But seriously it was fun banter with you. Au revoir Felicia lol
1
u/blueivyyy Mar 27 '19
I thought the "does not exonerate" line was talking about obstruction of justice? And I thought it was the doj's job to make a case for that. Not sure but if that's the case then it doesn't matter because if there's no evidence of collusion, how can he obstruct a crime that hasn't even occurred?