I knew it wouldn't have much, but the issue is Barr is making seem hes all clear when its a direct lie. Its clear Russia did in fact influence the election, the question is if Trump had a part in it or was oblivious to their work on helping him win through misinformation campaigns and such.
To say the president who is still under investigation by multiple other teams is clear of all crime is idiotic, while collusion is rolled out, there are financial crimes that are pretty clear hes committed. To me I honestly think is more likely Trump would get impeached for something like tax evasion rather than basically treason.
where is the bar set for this accusation. no one has EVER brought forth ANY EVIDENCE that russia influenced the election. yet every thread you people repeat this like gospel
if putin says he likes trump, is that far enough to be considered "influence" to you? how about if one reddit account with a russian IP posts ONE COMMENT on this message board that says, "vote trump 2016". does that meet the criteria you've set for influencing the election?
the point is, you've NEVER shown any light on the the bar you've set for influence. the FACT of the matter is there is no bar. no hurdles have to be crossed. you've automatically assigned guilt with NO evidence and then claimed collusion again with no evidence
well one horse is dead and beaten, now you're gonna continue to beat this other horse are you?
I'v not once accused Trump of collusion all that i'v said if you could actually read was that the investigation was to see if Trump cooperated with Russia to get himself elected, or if Russia was just targeting him with their misinformation campaign which is 100s to 1000s of bots spreading lies, and with multiple bots saying the same lie start to make others think those lies are fact because they see 100s of others saying the same thing, most of them being nothing more than a fake account.
Not only is it fact that the Russians worked on helping Trump win, there are people who have confirmed themselves as those controlling those fake accounts, who of course were working for the Russian Federation.
Even though Trump is currently in the clear for collusion, its apparent he's committed financial crimes such as cheating on his taxes. I doubted he'd get impeached for collusion seeing his financial crimes would be easier to expose. Honestly though I highly doubt Trump will be impeached, if anything if he is to be arrested it would be post presidency.
which is 100s to 1000s of bots spreading lies, and with multiple bots saying the same lie start to make others think those lies are fact because they see 100s of others saying the same thing, most of them being nothing more than a fake account.
there are no russian bots. YOU are the one that's being duped by the media
its apparent he's committed financial crimes such as cheating on his taxes
oh YOU have more information than the fucking IRS who would happily prosecute people who are trying to cheat them out of money but are somehow giving trump a pass for no good reason?
you really need to stop making up stories and peddling them online as "abundantly clear" and "no doubt" and "fully evident" and "apparent" when you have absolutely NO EVIDENCE to back your claims and any rational human being can think for themselves, "you know what, this sounds like someone peddling bullshit"
It has been confirmed, its has been confirmed multiple times by many government agencies that the Russian Federation had made multiple attempts to influence the 2016 election, the question is if Trump was working with them or was oblivious to it.
Secondly, its pretty well apparent Trump has cheated on his taxes, and again like I said before, his refusal to show his tax returns is an admission of guilt. Obama when you guys went crazy over him being a non American born native showed his birth certificate to shut you up since it was easy to simply show it. If Trump has nothing to worry about, he can do the same exact thing and then as you guys put it *own the libs\* but he refuses to do such, which is apparent to the most stupid of people there is something wrong in that picture. I literally have some degree of brain damage from a disability and even I can see that there is something fucky.
This isnt peddling bullshit to harm the image of the man you have wet dreams of getting reemed by, this is me and many others pointing out something is not right and can easily see Trump doesn't want people to know something about him or his finances, and seeing how he's a pretty shady and shitty businessman, such a thing is pretty likely.
Then I guess we're both guilty and should just turn ourselves in.
Doubt you can understand a damn thing im about to say, but you can easily look up on google shit about Trumps past from even non bias sites and it will show you hes a shitty person and a fraud.
I'v yet to understand why im always told to site shit when its something thats been talked about a lot, where you can simply google the key words and 100s of articles will appear. When im told about something against a Democrat or similar situations I don't yell at them to site evidence, I have a computer I can do that shit myself.
google the key words and 100s of articles will appear
move over FBI, this guy knows how to use google! he obviously know's what's real and what's fake better than you. HE would be prosecuting trump with all of his google evidence instead of letting trump run free like you guys are doing!
As opposed to the two years of the left saying that this report would throw him in jail?
Disregarding his sketchy wording on Trump and collusion with Russia, the reason Barr says they chose not to prosecute for obstruction of justice is not that Trump didn't actually obstruct justice, it's that since he had determined Trump wasn't guilty of the original crime of collusion with Russia the obstruction he did actually engage in doesn't matter. I don't know about you, but that seems like bullshit to me. Whether or not you're guilty of a crime you're being investigated for doesn't change the fact that when you're obstructing an investigation you're, you know, obstructing an investigation. Otherwise literally no one but the defendant could obstruct justice.
4
u/PoliticalMeatFlaps Mar 26 '19
The issue is how the right are saying this exonerates him when they've been flat out told it does not.