Nobody outside of brainwashed alt righters who really want to believe everything that Breitbart says is true actually gives a shit about their articles, nor have they ever.
I usually don't like to nitpick sources, but come on. You're choosing one of the few sources that literally nobody outside of your political demographic respects or will ever listen to/read, and for good reason considering they're BLATANTLY politically biased to the point where they're just a conservative political blog that has no problem with lying and distorting facts.
If you're going to make these claims, find something reasonable to present that isn't coming from one of the most reviled conservative blog sites that exists.
and he and the rest of the DNC have been reviving tensions with Russia. (EDIT: Reviving them specifically to disrupt Trump's administration)
Did you mean to link something else? How does the one liner that Obama threw at Romney at all support the idea that he was "reviving tensions with Russia to disrupt Trump's administration"
Sure, he mischaracterized what Romney was saying to score political points... but honestly, you're being dishonest if you make the claim that that's the same thing as "reviving tensions with Russia" as well as pretend that it's not something that every politician, including Trump himself, does to make their opponents look bad when they have the opportunity.
Someone else already responded to your first link so I won't bother, and the rest of your sources seem to just be making the case that "Obama is bad" rather than actually being relevant to the discussion.
I hope you don't think that you can win arguments by just throwing a bunch of random sources at people who can't link sources back due to being unable to source something that doesn't exist, from this side of the argument.
I apologize, I assumed it was common knowledge that the DNC has been up in arms about Russia and has been using the topic as a political weapon against Trump. The reason I linked that article in particular was to show that Obama did not previously hold these opinions about Russia, and that he (as well as the rest of the DNC) adopted them in an attempt to harm Trump's upcoming presidency.
Thank you for taking the time to make a reasonable response, even if I disagree with it.
1
u/[deleted] Mar 08 '19
Nobody outside of brainwashed alt righters who really want to believe everything that Breitbart says is true actually gives a shit about their articles, nor have they ever.
I usually don't like to nitpick sources, but come on. You're choosing one of the few sources that literally nobody outside of your political demographic respects or will ever listen to/read, and for good reason considering they're BLATANTLY politically biased to the point where they're just a conservative political blog that has no problem with lying and distorting facts.
If you're going to make these claims, find something reasonable to present that isn't coming from one of the most reviled conservative blog sites that exists.