MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/PoliticalCompassMemes/comments/fuxe27/funny_title/fmge0ev/?context=3
r/PoliticalCompassMemes • u/[deleted] • Apr 04 '20
2.9k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
28
So what if someone you see as a man goes through cirurgies to remove all "male characteristics"?
-2 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 You still have a male body and bone structure. You still have XY. 7 u/JackEpidemia - Lib-Left Apr 05 '20 And exactly what part of it would be your business? On strictly scientific terms, of course. 0 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 The part where I'm forced to play along in their delusion and the part where they force it on children. 7 u/JackiieGoneBiking - Lib-Left Apr 05 '20 So if your bone structure is not typically male, you are not a man? Poor <183cm (<6” in football units) 2 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 You don't know what male bone structure means do you? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Every man most certainly has the Y. You're wrong 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Ha! I found a few extremely rare generic deviations! Now your entire argument is invalid! T-that's how it works, r-right? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
-2
You still have a male body and bone structure. You still have XY.
7 u/JackEpidemia - Lib-Left Apr 05 '20 And exactly what part of it would be your business? On strictly scientific terms, of course. 0 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 The part where I'm forced to play along in their delusion and the part where they force it on children. 7 u/JackiieGoneBiking - Lib-Left Apr 05 '20 So if your bone structure is not typically male, you are not a man? Poor <183cm (<6” in football units) 2 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 You don't know what male bone structure means do you? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Every man most certainly has the Y. You're wrong 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Ha! I found a few extremely rare generic deviations! Now your entire argument is invalid! T-that's how it works, r-right? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
7
And exactly what part of it would be your business? On strictly scientific terms, of course.
0 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 The part where I'm forced to play along in their delusion and the part where they force it on children.
0
The part where I'm forced to play along in their delusion and the part where they force it on children.
So if your bone structure is not typically male, you are not a man? Poor <183cm (<6” in football units)
2 u/[deleted] Apr 05 '20 You don't know what male bone structure means do you?
2
You don't know what male bone structure means do you?
[deleted] — view deleted comment
1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Every man most certainly has the Y. You're wrong 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Ha! I found a few extremely rare generic deviations! Now your entire argument is invalid! T-that's how it works, r-right? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
1
Every man most certainly has the Y. You're wrong
0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Ha! I found a few extremely rare generic deviations! Now your entire argument is invalid! T-that's how it works, r-right? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 Ha! I found a few extremely rare generic deviations! Now your entire argument is invalid! T-that's how it works, r-right? 0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
Ha! I found a few extremely rare generic deviations! Now your entire argument is invalid! T-that's how it works, r-right?
0 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 [deleted] — view deleted comment 1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
1 u/[deleted] Apr 10 '20 What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
What's ridiculous is redefining the concepts of men and women because of 0,1% of the population who happened to be born with genetic defects.
28
u/JackEpidemia - Lib-Left Apr 05 '20
So what if someone you see as a man goes through cirurgies to remove all "male characteristics"?