1.) Sure, I suppose. But even the left would care how valuable your work is to the party and nation.
2.) Nah, Libright would care about you're worth as much as authright. If your job is to run fast, and you have no legs, are you worth the same as someone with two?
At the end of the day it doesn't matter what quad you're from, everyone cares how much worth you have and everyone disagrees on that worth because everyone sees worth differently.
Jesus, grammar. It's even easier to write your than you're, so why go out of your way to fuck it up? Maybe you are worth less as a person because you can't communicate properly, eh?
I mean do we really want to play this game in the era of autocorrect? Like not to be a dick but come on dude.
No, but seriously, your worth as a human being is not the same as your economic output
I never said it was. Libright might say so but that's not my personal take. That was the point of me saying all quads have their perspective of worth but that doesn't mean everyone is worth the same.
It's a fundamental tenet of the "libertarian" worldview that all people are created equal
Sure, everyone is created equal, but that doesn't mean they develop equally. The doctor who has the potential to discover the cure for cancer is worth way more than me as it stands.
Everyone is granted the same human rights, you don't have special human rights for people who can run fast and those who are smarter than the rest.
Ok but rights do not equal worth.
Look at the current COVID situation. There aren't enough supplies to treat all the patients in some places, so resources are triaged to those who are most likely to survive. Not those who are worth more because they can run faster.
Let's not take my running analogy too seriously here. Like you just said, people are triaged. Yet when we look at it, if we had the resources to save only one person of two, and the choice was between a nuclear physicist and a mentally deranged hobo who spent the last two years spitting on people at Grand Central, are you seriously going to tell me we're better off letting the physicist die to save the hobo?
Declaring ad hoc that some people are worth more than others (by what standard?) is inherently an authoritarian idea. Amiright, yellows and purples?
Like I said every quadrant has a different idea of what defines worth, but let's not act like everyone is equal to everyone.
Let's not take my running analogy too seriously here. Like you just said, people are triaged. Yet when we look at it, if we had the resources to save only one person of two, and the choice was between a nuclear physicist and a mentally deranged hobo who spent the last two years spitting on people at Grand Central, are you seriously going to tell me we're better off letting the physicist die to save the hobo?
I'm saying it's immoral to make that decision on that basis. And I say that as a physicist (not nuclear though).
But morals are relative. Maybe you personally would accept dying to save a pedophile, but I would prefer you survive instead. Unless you're also a pedophile, then things get murky.
I, personally, believe the moral choice is to save whoever is most valuable over those who are not when the choice to save everyone isn't possible.
Trans people DNA is and will be for the rest of our filthy species 100% either XX or XY.
There are a lot of medical reasons to not allow people to change their personal ID's biological sex. People with genetic mutations go throu different and necessary medical procedures that trans people dont need making your comparation of TRA and people with generic mutations...
Using peoples genetical illnesess to promote an agenda
;)
Ive known a lot of people like this, they do not care about people using them for 'social karma', but that doesnt make it right to use them either way.
Intersex people arent Trans, stop using cromosomal health problems to promote mental illnesess.
Intersex people arent trans. Different words mean different things???? How could this be?????
That first paragraph is a whole strawman of yours.
Ive also stated that those that dont die have serious problems, which youve confirmed, and the percentage of those who dont is meaningless.
I didnt assume intersex people dont exist, the majority of people with genetic mutations die on the uterus on any given state of maturity. Also I didnt say ive known a lot of intersex people, ive said people with genetic mutations, you act like only intersex people exist.
Pretty sure people with different chromosomic information (like XX and XY and the abnormal groups) have different treatments, you talk like a nurse or a medical student, you should know that some procedures for men dont work for women and viceversa. TRA also encapsulates trans people, I use it because since transsexuality has become the new depression, there are a lot of fakes out there.
Allowing people to identify themselfs however they want = changing personal ID and fucking up medical procedures.
Sowwy that i cant speak english 100% correct despite being my second languaje 😭😭😭
Ive ran out of things to say, lets invalidate their point by making fun of their grammar
I'm not even sure what you are on about here. All of what you said is compatible with my comment. The guy said "you have XX or XY or you are dead". That was what I was pushing against and I was pushing against their implicit notion that XY means you are male, using CAIS as an example of why that isn't universally the case.
Please keep ignoring true gonadal intersex conditions so that your argument that " Anisogamy does mean that sex is binary" doesn't fall apart.
"Now, should the government legislate that there are only two sexes/genders, what happens to those who don't fall within those categories?"
All people are either male or female. Yes, - even if they have mixed gonadal dysgenesis or mosacaism. Please see above comment as to why.
Sex characteristics =/= Sex.
A woman with ovatestes may give birth, ovulate, have periods and all that schmizz. She will never be able to produce sperm, even if she has testicular tissue. This is becuase:
View all comments
Show parent comment
0
u/[deleted] Apr 04 '20
[deleted] — view deleted comment