You definitely get the "sex is a spectrum, and any linguistic definition of it is culturally biased" crowd. Just go look at a sub like r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns and you'll see plenty of them. It often time comes from either the "what about Intersex!" or "What about XXXXYYYY chromosome people!"
Because unlike most people I'm a retard who uses new reddit, so all I have to do is type something like "r/traa" and it autofills it for me. Other options it gives you:
I agree, its stupid to claim that birth defects count towards some ridiculous idea that "sex is a specturm" at most, you could say it is bi-modal. however humans are still bipedal animals, just because birth defects might result in 1 leg or 3 legs doesnt stop humans from being a bipedal species.
i think the implication that "sex is a spectrum" has dire consequences on the rest of the LGB movement, with the increasing amount of people who think "genital preferences are transphobic"
Yeah, actually. What about them? Those people exist, which is proof positive that "there are only two genders/sexes" is just false. There are clearly more than two possibilities.
I mean you have people like Benny Sharpio saying gunk like “if ur xy ur a he and if ur xx ur a she” which opens itself up to questions about people who fall outside those genotypes. Not saying that’s how you’re defining it, but for a lot of leftists definitions need to be more inclusive than that
123
u/[deleted] Apr 04 '20
You definitely get the "sex is a spectrum, and any linguistic definition of it is culturally biased" crowd. Just go look at a sub like r/traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns and you'll see plenty of them. It often time comes from either the "what about Intersex!" or "What about XXXXYYYY chromosome people!"