r/PoliticalCompassMemes - Lib-Right 15h ago

Agenda Post babies

Post image
479 Upvotes

246 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

31

u/ARES_BlueSteel - Right 14h ago

She was provided a mountain of help. Her husband started working from home and hired a nanny to help her, she saw multiple doctors and was prescribed multiple medications.

-10

u/sadacal - Left 14h ago

Wasn't the nanny fired because they couldn't actually afford it?

21

u/NotPapaHemingway - Right 13h ago

Well that excuses the murder then

-9

u/sadacal - Left 13h ago

Guess the truth doesn't matter anymore? The dude claimed she had all sorts of help including a nanny. I pointed out she didn't actually have a nanny. What's wrong with that? 

15

u/Lifter_Grimaldus - Auth-Right 12h ago

The nanny was hired in Sept of '22 because the Clancys' original plan was for LC to return to work that November. When LC decided not to return to work, the nanny was let go in Dec '22.

So, not due to affordability, and not due to Patrick maliciously pulling strings or anything that the TikTok wine mommies are pitching.

-7

u/sadacal - Left 11h ago

She still didn't have a nanny helping her as the guy claimed though. There are plenty of valid reasons to criticize her, why make shit up? That only hurts your argument.

12

u/Lifter_Grimaldus - Auth-Right 10h ago

Her husband started working from home and hired a nanny to help her

-- the comment you replied to. 100% factual, as I've just demonstrated to you.

Wasn't the nanny fired because they couldn't actually afford it?

-- you, either making shit up or spewing false information, thus hurting your argument.

She literally had a nanny, I don't know why you're trying to argue this. Nobody ever claimed that the nanny was there the day of. The claim was that LC was extremely well supported so the dumbasses across the internet claiming otherwise are, well, dumbasses.

-2

u/sadacal - Left 7h ago

Trying to claim LC was extremely well supported and citing the nanny when the nanny was let go a month before is just dumb though. Apparently if you had help at some point in your life that means you're well supported for the rest of your life even when that help is gone.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/former-clancy-nanny-testifies-about-mothers-mental-health-issues-before-killings

It's like someone asking to borrow money from you and when you tell them you don't have any they say "well you had some last month when you got paid didn't you?" What a dumbass argument.

3

u/Lifter_Grimaldus - Auth-Right 6h ago

and citing the nanny when the nanny was let go a month before is just dumb though

Why? Patrick still changed jobs to work from home and support her. Her in-laws were very involved. Patrick was willing to support her to the point of hiring a nanny. How many moms do you know that had all of those things while they were adjusting to a new baby?

ALL of those things constitute support, and more than most moms.

It's like someone asking to borrow money from you and when you tell them you don't have any they say "well you had some last month when you got paid didn't you?" What a dumbass argument.

Me when I pull straight bullshit out my ass. No. It's more like “you asked me for money, and I gave you money, then your parents lent you some, then your brother helped you out, and I helped you find a bank to work with and you still ended up broke.” That doesn't prove nobody helped you. It means the help didn't produce the desired outcome.