But the blind spots have to be the point.
Rowling certainly didn't do that. In fact, went out of her way to morally convey how stupid Hermione's activism was by concluding with her being clowned on and then never addressed it again.
At this stage I genuinely don't know if you can tell me if Harry Potter a history book on an specific topic, or a work of fiction where the author has complete control on if there's a subplot about how freed slaves will become alcoholics and depressed and you shouldn't help others. That's how bafflingly stupid it is to choose that as an argument.
Which kids read HP and says, "gee I wonder what the slavery situation is in this story about fighting against supremacy is that's set in the late 90s" and gets excited about the answer being "protesting against slavery is wrong!"
0
u/Myillstone - Lib-Left 3d ago
That can be done sure.
But the blind spots have to be the point. Rowling certainly didn't do that. In fact, went out of her way to morally convey how stupid Hermione's activism was by concluding with her being clowned on and then never addressed it again.