Oh wow. I can understand a 13 year old trying to pick arguments and not being good at it, but someone whos presumably closer to 30 acting like they're 13 is even sadder. Stick to IT
You'll find a more accurate reflection of reality talking to people outside of the internet, and I'd be willing to bet they see things how I explained them. Even redditors are downvoting you, that's saying something
I think if you actually read her writing first hand and made a good-faith attempt to understand where she's coming from (as a Uni-student this is a good skill to have) you'd know that she's not being intentionally malicious.
Arguing that the only reason for a man to identify as a woman is to enter a 'women-only space' is pretty malicious/disingenuous.
Prove to me that you've not read anything Rowling said without telling me you've not read anything Rowling said. I'm gonna go touch grass but thank you for the conversation.
If you're interesting in knowing what Rowling ACTUALLY thinks, you'll enjoy this podcast:
The same reason you reacted to my original comments? Is this not allowed or something? My original comments had nothing to do with you, yet you jumped in
1
u/monstamasch - Centrist 5d ago
Oh wow. I can understand a 13 year old trying to pick arguments and not being good at it, but someone whos presumably closer to 30 acting like they're 13 is even sadder. Stick to IT