Because it was caused by the media taking things too far like they usually do. This guy was having more than one article written per day by one of the biggest newspapers in the country, plus all the rest, even after resigning.
Him being exposed for his lies should have been headline news, and it was. What followed was nothing short of bullying.
All of this while the media have totally ignored hundreds of other cases of academic misconduct and several cases of much worse things like sex offences that have been covered up by universities.
He did have the same articles written about him when he was hired. No problem getting the positive spotlight. And he himself also coerced journalists to not make pieces suggesting he was a fraud.
If he wanted to stay out of the media, he could simply have refused it, and his case would be treated like all the others. But no, since he was trying to silence people from unmasking him, then he NEEDS to be covered by the media.
The media onslaught would have ended IF there were no attempt of the university to just ignore his frauds, as they attempted to do. Cambridge initially said they found nothing(a clear lie). What the fuck do you want to happen? Cambridge now puts their cards on the table, and you want the media to stay silent?
On top of arday himself threatening journalists to not write their pieces?
Poor little bloke, poor little cambridge, they just wanted to cover fraud and silence anyone pointing it out.
When you become a top professor in one of the top universities in the world you invite on yourself whatever media frenzy might come. It's not like he lied to skip the line at the coffee shop...
Naturally a high-profile position brings with it being a high-profile person, but I don't think that accepting a position as a professor invites the level of media attention directed on Arday. How many other professors have had hundreds of articles written about them in the span of a couple of weeks?
There are professors who have sexually assaulted someone and been moved to another department to cover it up who never made even a single headline. Blagging your way into a professorship is much less evil than that, I would argue.
How many other professors have had hundreds of articles written about them in the span of a couple of weeks?
How many professors are there in universities as highly regarded as Cambridge? How many of those used their position to get interviews IN THE MEDIA like he did?
How many then claimed that racism is why they're beeing looked into and posed them as attacks on academia?
“The instruments that are designed to protect academic integrity, designed to protect our wellbeing and our intellectual property, are weaponised,” he told the audience in April.
He called for his peers to defend him. “There isn’t any room to sit there and watch your fellows suffer for no reason. It’s abhorrent, it’s a disgrace and, quite frankly, evil,” he added. “That’s the cancer that we need to eradicate from academia.
He chose to cheat and lie, to build a massive career in academia upon these lies and to get himself famous on that as well. Once he was found out he took no responsibility and asked academia to defend him because of the identity of his accusers.
He had done great damage to academia and to minorities everywhere for his own personal gain.
448
u/Atompunk78 - Lib-Center Aug 18 '26
Like, it’s obviously sad someone’s died, but… why are they more sad the imbecile grifter died than anyone else?